2014
DOI: 10.1177/0888406414525049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

eCoaching: The Effects on Co-Teachers’ Planning and Instruction

Abstract: Abstract:Although co-teaching has become a popular approach to special education service provision in inclusive classrooms, practitioners have struggled to carry it out well. One suggestion for improvement has been to provide co-teachers with training that includes coaching. In this study, we used single-case (ABAB) withdrawal design, to investigate the effects of eCoaching, delivered through online bug-in-ear technology, on co-teachers as they planned and carried out co-teaching. Participants included three c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Teachers increased their use of evidence-based behavior strategies with the onset of the coaching strategies. Ploessl and Rock (2014) used BIE and Skype technologies to coach teachers to improve co-teaching planning practices. A single case, reversal design, was used to measure a change in planning from six co-teacher dyads.…”
Section: Videoconferencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers increased their use of evidence-based behavior strategies with the onset of the coaching strategies. Ploessl and Rock (2014) used BIE and Skype technologies to coach teachers to improve co-teaching planning practices. A single case, reversal design, was used to measure a change in planning from six co-teacher dyads.…”
Section: Videoconferencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One other serious issue is that on multiple occasions, studies lacked sufficient replications of an effect to demonstrate a functional relationship between performance feedback and teacher behavior; however, the researchers still made positive conclusions about the effectiveness of performance feedback (e.g., Ploessl & Rock, 2014). Without a functional relationship, one cannot say with confidence that an independent variable has caused changes in a dependent variable (Gast, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, researchers have begun using technology to provide real-time performance feedback privately or at a distance using bug-in-ear systems or Internetbased video conferencing software to provide performance feedback at a distance (Goodman, Brady, Duffy, Scott, & Pollard, 2008;Machalicek et al, 2010;Ploessl & Rock, 2014;Rock et al, 2012;Rock et al, 2009;Rock et al, 2014;Scheeler et al, 2010 paired video conferencing with bug-in-ear to provide private feedback to teachers who responded with improved instructional practices. Researchers have also had positive effects using similar, real-time feedback in person using bug-in-ear systems to provide feedback privately to teachers during instruction (e.g., Goodman et al, 2008) Agent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We know, for instance, SETs tend to take on an assistant role, working with students individually or performing clerical duties, such as making copies (Ashton, 2014;Bessette, 2008;BruscaVega, Brown, & Yasutake, 2011;Fenty & McDuffie-Landrum, 2011;Harbort et al, 2007;KingSears, Brawand, Jenkins, & Preston-Smith, 2014;Mageira, Smith, Zigmond, & Gebauer, 2005;Moin et al, 2009;Ploessl & Rock, 2014;Rice & Zigmond, 2000). We also know they spend most of their time monitoring and responding to individual students within a whole-group environment, and a substantial amount of time on non-instructional tasks (Bettini, Kimerling, Park, & Murphy, 2015;Harbort et al, 2007;Moin et al, 2009;Murawski, 2006;Vannest, Hagan-Burke, Parker, & Soares, 2011).…”
Section: Current Research and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We know also the predominant co-teaching model used by teams is the one-teach-oneassist model, with the GET in the lead teaching role and the SET serving as an assistant, helping students stay on task or even performing clerical or housekeeping duties in the classroom (Ashton, 2014;Bessette, 2008;Brusca-Vega et al, 2011;Fenty & McDuffie-Landrum, 2011;Gürgür & Uzuner, 2010;Harbort et al, 2007;King-Sears et al, 2014;Moin et al, 2009;Ploessl & Rock, 2014;Rice & Zigmond, 2000). There is some indication this might be more true of secondary classrooms than elementary, probably due to the special educator's lack of comfort with content (Bessette, 2008;Rice & Zigmond, 2000;Scruggs et al, 2007;Weiss & Lloyd, 2002).…”
Section: Teacher Roles and Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%