2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eco-socialism and the political ecology of forest conservation in the Greater Khingan Range, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…making related to the management of conservation areas represent a challenge due to the delays and obstacles faced in implementing effective environmental preservation policies. Maryudi et al, 2022;Sahide et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2023;Zhu & Lo, 2022) Dependency on partnerships…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…making related to the management of conservation areas represent a challenge due to the delays and obstacles faced in implementing effective environmental preservation policies. Maryudi et al, 2022;Sahide et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2023;Zhu & Lo, 2022) Dependency on partnerships…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 1949, the SOFRs in Northeast China have cumulatively produced over 1.23 billion m 3 of timber, making significant contributions to China's economic construction and industrial production. Economically, these SOFEs were taken as "workshops" of the "national factory", performing production tasks set by central planners [12]. At the same time, they provided ample employment opportunities for workers and their family members.…”
Section: Institutional Background Of Sofes Participating In Community...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current research on the reform of SOFRs in Northeast China mainly focuses on the implementation process of the reform and its outcomes in terms of economy and ecology [7][8][9]. Some studies have noticed the impact of the reform on forestry communities and residents' livelihoods [10][11][12]. However, the transformation of forestry community governance architecture, the changes in the roles of SOFEs in forestry community governance, and the impacts on SOFEs have not attracted widespread attention from scholars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the state does not just monitor the public, but also a wide range of different subjects, including businesses, the environment, and even the government apparatus themselves; therefore, it is too narrow to equate disciplinary power with biopower. Considering environmental surveillance as an example, the monitoring of ambient air quality is an important policy tool in both formulating and enforcing policies [27], whereas remote sensing surveillance has been used to detect companies violating forest conservation policies [28]. Furthermore, surveillance is not only a tool of the powerful but has also been used by communities and non-governmental organizations.…”
Section: Techno-politics Of Surveillancementioning
confidence: 99%