dwt 2012
DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2012.2319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eco-friendly waste water treatment by cow dung powder (Adsorption studies of Cr(III), Cr(VI) and Cd(II) using tracer technique)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exhibit revealed that by an increase in contact time, the removal efficiency of heavy metal increased until a stable plateau region appeared at 300 min, indicating an equilibrium condition (Jeyaseelan & Gupta, 2016). For Cr(VI), removal efficiency increased from 18.2% to 93.4% when the contact time was increased from 15 to 300 min, which may be due to the presence of vacant sites at the initial stage (Barot & Bangla, 2012; Nwosu‐Obieogu & Okolo, 2020). However, there is no appreciable change in efficiency with further increase in contact time due to the deposition of ions available on adsorption sites and intraparticle diffusion processes that dominate over adsorption (Amin, Alazba, & Shafiq, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Exhibit revealed that by an increase in contact time, the removal efficiency of heavy metal increased until a stable plateau region appeared at 300 min, indicating an equilibrium condition (Jeyaseelan & Gupta, 2016). For Cr(VI), removal efficiency increased from 18.2% to 93.4% when the contact time was increased from 15 to 300 min, which may be due to the presence of vacant sites at the initial stage (Barot & Bangla, 2012; Nwosu‐Obieogu & Okolo, 2020). However, there is no appreciable change in efficiency with further increase in contact time due to the deposition of ions available on adsorption sites and intraparticle diffusion processes that dominate over adsorption (Amin, Alazba, & Shafiq, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At low pH, the H 3 O + concentration exceeds far beyond the metal ions and, therefore, it may bound to the sorbent; while at higher pH, the concentration of H 3 O + decreases due to the absorption of positive‐charged metal ions on the active sites of biosorbent (Parab et al., 2006). Apart from this, at low pH, the adsorption decreased due to the electrostatic repulsion of the positive‐charged (H + ) ions (Barot & Bangla, 2012; Parlayici &Pehlivan, 2019). When the pH of the solution increases, the removal percentage increases owing to electrostatic attraction of the positively charged surface over OH ‐ ions (Bayuo, Pelig‐Ba, & Abukari, 2019; Nwosu‐Obieogu & Okolo, 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conventional technologies for treating wastewater containing hexavalent chromium include adsorption [18,19], reduction to Cr(III) followed by precipitation [20], biological [21,22] and membrane separation processes [14,23]. Chemical reduction to Cr(III) followed by precipitation is the most used technique for the removal of Cr(VI) ions from polluted wastewaters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many biosorbents have been used in past years for chromium ion (VI) removal; however, the search for an eco-friendly and low-cost biomaterials remains an active area of research. Biosorption potential of Araucaria leaves [10], Wheat (Triticum aestivum) shells [11], Litchi chinensis [12], Sunflower head waste-based biosorbent (FSH) [13], Corinadrum sativum [14], Wood apple shell [15], Mangifera indica bark dust [16], Tobacco leaf [17], Cow dung powder [18], Fruit peel of Trewia nudiflora plant [19], and Ornamental plants [20] have recently been tested for Cr(VI) biosorption. The present study focussed on assessing the ability of environmentally benign adsorbent Artemisia absinthium, which belongs to the family Asteraceae.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%