2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2013.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eco-environmental implications of elemental and carbon isotope distributions in ornithogenic sediments from the Ross Sea region, Antarctica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lithologic characteristics of the three sediment profiles are shown in Fig. 3, and more detailed information has been reported previously by Nie et al (2012) and Liu et al (2013).…”
Section: Study Area and Sample Collectionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lithologic characteristics of the three sediment profiles are shown in Fig. 3, and more detailed information has been reported previously by Nie et al (2012) and Liu et al (2013).…”
Section: Study Area and Sample Collectionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The significantly positive correlations of P with measured and inferred chlorophyll a (Fig. 5) suggest that the input of penguin guano caused the increase of nutrient levels, which could promote the growth of phytoplankton and the enhancement of primary productivity in these small lake or ponds (Liu et al 2013). Nevertheless, low P and chlorophyll a levels were observed in some samples not affected by penguin guano.…”
Section: Effect Of Seabird Droppings Input On East Antarctic Lake Primentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The most widely used sedimentary proxies for birds are geochemical, and can be classified as either trace element (Liu et al 2006a, 2006b, Xie and Sun 2008, Brimble et al 2009, Huang et al 2009, Nie et al 2014a or stable isotope (Hawke 2004, Sun et al 2005, Yuan et al 2010, Keatley et al 2011, Liu et al 2013, Nie et al 2014b) proxies. A key strength of geochemical proxies is their ability to record marine inputs into terrestrial ecosystems, and therefore their main utility has been for inferring the past distribution (e.g., Hawke et al 1999, Yuan et al 2010), colony longevity (Hawke 2004), and population trends (e.g., Sun et al 2005, Liu et al 2006a, Huang et al 2009 of marine birds such as procellariiforms and penguins.…”
Section: Sedimentary Proxies For Birdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, rare-earth elements have also been proven to be an effective avian proxy , Nie et al 2014a. Isotopic proxies for seabirds include d 15 N (although recently it has been suggested that D 15 N may be more useful in some circumstances; Liu et al 2006, Nie et al 2014b, d 13 C (Liu et al 2006(Liu et al , 2013, and 87 Sr/ 86 Sr ratios (Sun et al 2005). Geochemical proxies have been applied at a local scale (to ornithogenic sediments, i.e.…”
Section: Sedimentary Proxies For Birdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most widely used sedimentary proxies for birds are geochemical, and can be classified as either trace element (Liu et al 2006a, 2006b, Xie and Sun 2008, Brimble et al 2009, Huang et al 2009, Nie et al 2014a or stable isotope (Hawke 2004, Sun et al 2005, Yuan et al 2010, Keatley et al 2011, Liu et al 2013, Nie et al 2014b) proxies. A key strength of geochemical proxies is their ability to record marine inputs into terrestrial ecosystems, and therefore their main utility has been for inferring the past distribution (e.g., Hawke et al 1999, Yuan et al 2010), colony longevity (Hawke 2004), and population trends (e.g., Sun et al 2005, Liu et al 2006a, Huang et al 2009 of marine birds such as procellariiforms and penguins.…”
Section: Sedimentary Proxies For Birdsmentioning
confidence: 99%