2021
DOI: 10.3390/wevj12010006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eco-Driving for Different Electric Powertrain Topologies Considering Motor Efficiency

Abstract: Electrification and automatization may change the environmental impact of vehicles. Current eco-driving approaches for electric vehicles fit the electric power of the motor by quadratic functions and are limited to powertrains with one motor and single-speed transmission or use computationally expensive algorithms. This paper proposes an online nonlinear algorithm, which handles the non-convex power demand of electric motors. Therefore, this algorithm allows the simultaneous optimization of speed profile and p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, when the transmission is in the first gear, when the velocity is less than 17 km/h, the efficiency of motor 1 is higher; when the velocity is more than 27 km/h, the efficiency of motor 2 is higher; and when the velocity is between 17 and 27 km/h, the efficiency of motor 1 and motor 2 is both relatively high, taking into account that the demand torque of the vehicle in the low-speed zone of 17~27 km/h on the low-gear position is larger, the efficiency of the corresponding motor 1 is higher at this time [20]. Therefore, motor 1 can be considered as a preferred choice.…”
Section: Research On Driving Control Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, when the transmission is in the first gear, when the velocity is less than 17 km/h, the efficiency of motor 1 is higher; when the velocity is more than 27 km/h, the efficiency of motor 2 is higher; and when the velocity is between 17 and 27 km/h, the efficiency of motor 1 and motor 2 is both relatively high, taking into account that the demand torque of the vehicle in the low-speed zone of 17~27 km/h on the low-gear position is larger, the efficiency of the corresponding motor 1 is higher at this time [20]. Therefore, motor 1 can be considered as a preferred choice.…”
Section: Research On Driving Control Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we also want to allow for significant deviations from the human trajectory, we define other metrics. As explained in [28], there are three common approaches to optimize energy efficiency: wheel-to-distance, tank-to-distance and the minimisation of the acceleration squared. The first two refer to energy minimization by means of a vehicle model that is not included in the CPM Olympics, in order to keep the task within reasonable bounds.…”
Section: B Evaluating the Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since driving style will be an important customer-relevant property of an AVC, the dimensions of the driving style must be considered in the property portfolio and the methods to test them should be part of the vehicle concept evaluation. Koch et al (2020) present an eco-driving algorithm to deal with the interdependence of the drivetrain and the driven driving style. They show the energy saving potentials and the downsizing potentials due to a co-optimization of multiple motors and gears.…”
Section: Research On Specific Aspects Of Autonomous Drivingmentioning
confidence: 99%