1965
DOI: 10.1130/0016-7606(1965)76[483:eaetda]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eclogites and Eclogites: Their Differences and Similarities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
189
0
17

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 636 publications
(211 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
189
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Garnets from the Çetmi region are also almandine-grossular rich with Al 61-73 , Grs 18-24 , Prp 1-17 , Sps 0.9-12 mol%. Garnet composition of these eclogites fits the C-type of Coleman, Lee, Beatty, and Brannock (1965) classification (Figure 6(a)), typical of eclogites occurring in subduction complexes. These C-type eclogites are commonly associated with blueschist.…”
Section: Mineral Chemistry 71 Garnetsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Garnets from the Çetmi region are also almandine-grossular rich with Al 61-73 , Grs 18-24 , Prp 1-17 , Sps 0.9-12 mol%. Garnet composition of these eclogites fits the C-type of Coleman, Lee, Beatty, and Brannock (1965) classification (Figure 6(a)), typical of eclogites occurring in subduction complexes. These C-type eclogites are commonly associated with blueschist.…”
Section: Mineral Chemistry 71 Garnetsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…3a) reflecting their relatively higher bulk-rock Ca composition. Garnets plot in the field of group C as defined by Coleman et al (1965) (Fig. 3a).…”
Section: Garnetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Garnet is typical of type C eclogite, which is defined by Coleman et al (1965) as crustally derived, relatively low-temperature eclogite. Garnet displays both prograde and sector zoning (Fig.…”
Section: Garnetmentioning
confidence: 99%