Whilst we do not wish to discredit ways of conducting research in the past, there is no denying that thinking about the research process in social geography has changed … a lot! In this chapter we aim to explore some of the developments and issues related to doing research by focusing particularly on " the ground, " i.e. the interaction with people, institutional contexts and elements in and through various spatial practices/processes. To do this, the chapter begins with a sketch of our own institutional contexts, exploring how knowledge production in The Netherlands has been perceived and valued over time and illustrating the impact of these roots on current research (and teaching). In so doing, we also clarify our own positionality, at least to some degree, in approaching the themes throughout this chapter. In the second section, titled " situating the politics of knowledge construction, " we consider the role of the body, social contexts (e.g., food and language), emotion and performance in the interaction between researcher and respondent. We draw attention to the fact that interviewing is, by no means, simply " extracting information " from another person but that knowledge generated in this context relies on more than questions and answers. In that context, we briefl y address the ethics of disseminating knowledge. Whilst much of the social research literature has drawn on interviews as main method of data collection, we also examine the impact of " newer " methods of data generation, such as walks and video, to draw attention to the different types of knowledge that different methods may generate. We illustrate that such performance -based methods produce different power relations, especially where respondents generate data on their own terms. The fi nal section of the chapter focuses more on other " elements " that impact the production of knowledge,