Echolocation behavior and signal plasticity in the Neotropical bat Myotis nigricans (Schinz, 1821) (Vespertilionidae): a convergent case with European species of Pipistrellus ?
Abstract:We used both field and flight cage observations to investigate the echolocation and foraging behavior of the seldom studied, small, aerial insectivorous bat Myotis nigricans (Vespertilionidae) in Panama. In contrast to its temperate congeners, M. nigricans foraged extensively in open space and showed an echolocation behavior well adapted to this foraging habitat. It broadcast narrowband echolocation signals of 7 ms duration that enhance the chance of prey detection in open space. Because of rhythmical alternat… Show more
“…This closely matches the dominant frequency in the biosonar cries of ten insectivorous bats known to occur in the area of Ecuador that we sampled (P. Jarrin, personal communication, from survey at Tinalandia, Eucador) (Albuja-V., 1999): -59.6±23.7·kHz [Tadarida brasiliensis (Simmons et al, 1978) Clicks, number of microclicks in the active modulation half-cycle; intensity, peak equivalent sound pressure level in decibels (dB pe SPL); isi, intra-cycle silent interval. (Belwood, 1988); Molossus molossus (Kössl et al, 1999); Rhynchonycteris naso (Fenton et al, 1999); Myotis nigricans (Siemers et al, 2001); Peropteryx macrotis, Mormops megalophylla, Eptesicus furinalis and Myotis keasyi (Rydell et al, 2002)]. However, this close match in frequency should be interpreted with caution as we have no way of knowing if the bat and moth assemblages were sampled randomly or the predator/prey dynamics between these assemblages.…”
The assemblage reached a half-maximum response shortly after the first response, at 763±479·ms from the end of the terminal buzz. Tiger moth response reached a maximum at 475±344·ms from the end of the sequence; during the approach phase, well before the onset of the terminal buzz. In short, much of tiger moth response to bat attack occurs outside of the jamming hypotheses' predictions. Furthermore, no relationship exists between the duty cycle of a tiger moth's call (and thus the call's probability of jamming the bat) and its temporal response to bat attack. These data call into doubt the assumptions behind the jamming hypothesis as currently stated but do not directly test the functionality of arctiid sounds in disrupting echolocation in bat-moth aerial battles.
“…This closely matches the dominant frequency in the biosonar cries of ten insectivorous bats known to occur in the area of Ecuador that we sampled (P. Jarrin, personal communication, from survey at Tinalandia, Eucador) (Albuja-V., 1999): -59.6±23.7·kHz [Tadarida brasiliensis (Simmons et al, 1978) Clicks, number of microclicks in the active modulation half-cycle; intensity, peak equivalent sound pressure level in decibels (dB pe SPL); isi, intra-cycle silent interval. (Belwood, 1988); Molossus molossus (Kössl et al, 1999); Rhynchonycteris naso (Fenton et al, 1999); Myotis nigricans (Siemers et al, 2001); Peropteryx macrotis, Mormops megalophylla, Eptesicus furinalis and Myotis keasyi (Rydell et al, 2002)]. However, this close match in frequency should be interpreted with caution as we have no way of knowing if the bat and moth assemblages were sampled randomly or the predator/prey dynamics between these assemblages.…”
The assemblage reached a half-maximum response shortly after the first response, at 763±479·ms from the end of the terminal buzz. Tiger moth response reached a maximum at 475±344·ms from the end of the sequence; during the approach phase, well before the onset of the terminal buzz. In short, much of tiger moth response to bat attack occurs outside of the jamming hypotheses' predictions. Furthermore, no relationship exists between the duty cycle of a tiger moth's call (and thus the call's probability of jamming the bat) and its temporal response to bat attack. These data call into doubt the assumptions behind the jamming hypothesis as currently stated but do not directly test the functionality of arctiid sounds in disrupting echolocation in bat-moth aerial battles.
“…Bats with damaged wing membranes, probably caused by a predator, were encountered during routine mist-netting at daytime roosts of M. albescens and M. nigricans. Both species are common aerialhawking insectivorous bats in lowland regions of the subtropical and tropical region of the New World, where they forage in the open space of rainforest gaps (Siemers et al, 2001;Rex et al, 2008). Bats were captured between 17:00h and 19:00h in front of buildings, using 6 and 9m mist nets (2.5m height, Ecotone, Gdynia, Poland).…”
SUMMARYInfection of North American bats with the keratin-digesting fungus Geomyces destructans often results in holes and ruptures of wing membranes, yet it is unknown whether flight performance and metabolism of bats are altered by such injuries. I conducted flight experiments in a circular flight arena with Myotis albescens and M. nigricans individuals with an intact or ruptured trailing edge of one of the plagiopatagial membranes. In both species, individuals with damaged wings were lighter, had a higher aspect ratio (squared wing span divided by wing area) and an increased wing loading (weight divided by wing area) than conspecifics with intact wings. Bats with an asymmetric reduction of the wing area flew at similar speeds to conspecifics with intact wings but performed fewer flight manoeuvres. Individuals with damaged wings showed lower metabolic rates during flight than conspecifics with intact wings, even when controlling for body mass differences; the difference in mass-specific metabolic rate may be attributable to the lower number of flight manoeuvres (U-turns) by bats with damaged wings compared with conspecifics with intact wings. Possibly, bats compensated for an asymmetric reduction in wing area by lowering their body mass and avoiding flight manoeuvres. In conclusion, it may be that bats suffer from moderate wing damage not directly, by experiencing increased metabolic rate, but indirectly, by a reduced manoeuvrability and foraging success. This could impede a batʼs ability to gain sufficient body mass before hibernation.
“…Echolocation is highly adaptable, offering one of biology's most compelling examples of convergent evolution (Siemers et al, 2001;Jones and Teeling, 2006). Echolocation call design is often shaped by environmental factors such as the proximity of clutter, and is therefore related to niche differentiation.…”
The two sibling mouse-eared bats, Myotis myotis and M. blythii, cope with similar orientation tasks, but separate their trophic niche by hunting in species-specific foraging microhabitats. Previous work has shown that both species rely largely on passive listening to detect and glean prey from substrates, and studies on other bat species have suggested that echolocation is 'switched off' during passive listening. We tested the hypothesis that mouse-eared bats continuously emit echolocation calls while approaching prey. Echolocation may be needed for orientation while simultaneously listening for prey. Because these sibling species forage in different microhabitats and eat different prey, we also compared their echolocation behaviour and related it to their ecology. Both species used echolocation throughout prey approach, corroborating a functional role for echolocation during gleaning. Captive bats of both species emitted similar orientation calls, and pulse rate increased during prey approach. Between the search to approach phases, call amplitude showed a sudden, dramatic drop and bats adopted 'whispering echolocation' by emitting weak calls. Whispering echolocation may reduce the risks of masking prey-generated sounds during passive listening, the mouse-eared bats' main detection tactic; it may also avoid alerting ultrasound-sensitive prey. In several cases M. myotis emitted a loud buzz made of 2-18 components when landing. We hypothesise that the buzz, absent in M. blythii at least when gleaning from the same substrate, is used to assess the distance from ground and refine the landing manoeuvre. Our findings have implications for niche separation between sibling species of echolocating bats, support a role for echolocation during passive listening and suggest a functional role for buzzes in landing control.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.