Advances in Echo Imaging Using Contrast Enhancement 1993
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-8126-4_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Echocontrast enhancers — how safe are they?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless of their chemical composition, there is a possibility that some microbubbles may become temporarily entrapped in the microcirculation, due to their size [25]. Microembolization should be suspected if tissue enhancement is static (as seen on B-mode imaging) and follows tissue motion, or if tissue enhancement lasts longer than opacification of the blood pool [26].…”
Section: Safety Of Tissue Perfusion Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of their chemical composition, there is a possibility that some microbubbles may become temporarily entrapped in the microcirculation, due to their size [25]. Microembolization should be suspected if tissue enhancement is static (as seen on B-mode imaging) and follows tissue motion, or if tissue enhancement lasts longer than opacification of the blood pool [26].…”
Section: Safety Of Tissue Perfusion Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The air bubbles increase the echo signal intensity of the vessels within the whole body. The safety of this agent has been verified by previous studies [6][7][8][9][10] .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The bubble size is preferably large to increase efficacy in sonography, 60 but should be smaller than the blood capillary diameter for safety. 61 A lipid coated bubble is usually smaller than 5 µm in radius. 62 Most of polymer or albumin coated bubbles are smaller than 10 µm in radius.…”
Section: A the Ranges Of The Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%