Echocardiography as a guide for fluid management

Abstract

BackgroundIn critically ill patients at risk for organ failure, the administration of intravenous fluids has equal chances of resulting in benefit or harm. While the intent of intravenous fluid is to increase cardiac output and oxygen delivery, unwelcome results in those patients who do not increase their cardiac output are tissue edema, hypoxemia, and excess mortality. Here we briefly review bedside methods to assess fluid responsiveness, focusing upon the strengths and pitfalls of echocardiography in spontaneously breathing mechanically ventilated patients as a means to guide fluid management. We also provide new data to help clinicians anticipate bedside echocardiography findings in vasopressor-dependent, volume-resuscitated patients.ObjectiveTo review bedside ultrasound as a method to judge whether additional intravenous fluid will increase cardiac output. Special emphasis is placed on the respiratory effort of the patient.ConclusionsPoint-of-care echocardiography has the unique ability to screen for unexpected structural findings while providing a quantifiable probability of a patient’s cardiovascular response to fluids. Measuring changes in stroke volume in response to either passive leg raising or changes in thoracic pressure during controlled mechanical ventilation offer good performance characteristics but may be limited by operator skill, arrhythmia, and open lung ventilation strategies. Measuring changes in vena caval diameter induced by controlled mechanical ventilation demands less training of the operator and performs well during arrythmia. In modern delivery of critical care, however, most patients are nursed awake, even during mechanical ventilation. In patients making respiratory efforts we suggest that ventilator settings must be standardized before assessing this promising technology as a guide for fluid management.

Two-dimensional echocardiography after return of spontaneous circulation and its association with in-hospital survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation

“…Third, 2D echocardiography may have helped to improve the quality of post-arrest care in patients with IHCA due to non-cardiac causes (e.g., sepsis or hypovolemia). Consistent with this possibility, 2D echocardiography has been reported to facilitate the management of septic and hypovolemic shock 7,8,17 .…”

Pre‐operative fluid bolus for improved haemodynamic stability during minor surgery: A prospectively randomized clinical trial

“…Minimally invasive devices can be used for perioperative monitoring and optimization of intravascular fluid volume via flow‐directed variables such as stroke volume variation, stroke volume index and cardiac index derived from pulse contour analysis . Echocardiographically derived measures, such as left ventricular end‐diastolic area and dynamic parameters as velocity time integral variation and inferior vena cava variations are reliable for monitoring perioperative fluid management and the identification of hypovolaemia …”

Need for Objective Assessment of Volume Status in Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19: The Tri-POCUS Approach

“…Volume responsiveness is usually defined as a measurable increase of 15% in cardiac output (or stroke volume in the absence of significant variation in the heart rate) in response to fluid challenge. Instead of exogenous administration of fluids, a "passive leg-raise" (PLR) maneuver is typically performed, which redistributes approximately 300-400 mL of blood from the lower extremities to the heart and stroke volume is measured 1-2 min later using cardiac ultrasound [21]. Assessment of the response to PLR virtually eliminates the need for "empiric" intravenous fluid administration, which can be detrimental in patients with ARDS.…”