Abstract:To evaluate the influence of echocardiographic examination in the clinical management of the sick neonate, 241 patients, admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary referral center that had echocardiograms with data available for review, were enrolled in a retrospective study. Asymptomatic murmurs (45%) followed by extracardiac anomalies/dysmorphic features (24%) were the most common clinical indications for requesting an echocardiogram. Congenital structural abnormalities (33%), hemodynamically… Show more
“…The evidence regarding the impact and safety of echocardiography performed by neonatologists in the NICU setting is largely available in the form of retrospective and prospective descriptive studies (Table 1). 2,5,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] These reports have consistently shown that, when available, targeted neonatal echocardiography is commonly used by neonatal clinicians in a number of cardiorespiratory disorders, often leads to changes in clinical management, Kadivar et al 19 Retrospective study of 241 neonates who underwent echocardiography performed by neonatologists under supervision of pediatric cardiologists at a single tertiary center. Most common clinical indication was murmurs, followed by extracardiac anomalies/dysmorphic features.…”
Focused cardiac sonography and targeted neonatal echocardiography refer to goal-directed cardiac imaging using ultrasound, typically by noncardiologic specialists. Although the former consists of a rapid qualitative assessment of cardiac function, which is usually performed by acute care practitioners, the latter refers to detailed functional echocardiography to obtain quantitative and qualitative indexes of pulmonary and systemic hemodynamics in sick neonates and is typically performed by neonatologists. Although the use of these modalities is increasing, they still remain unavailable in most North American centers providing acute care to neonates, partly because of limited data regarding their direct impact on patient care. Here we present a series of 5 cases from a large perinatal unit in which immediate availability of relevant expertise led to important and arguably life-saving clinical interventions. In 4 of these cases, focused cardiac sonography was sufficient to make the diagnosis, whereas in 1 case, clinical integration of detailed systemic hemodynamics measured on target neonatal echocardiography was required.
“…The evidence regarding the impact and safety of echocardiography performed by neonatologists in the NICU setting is largely available in the form of retrospective and prospective descriptive studies (Table 1). 2,5,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] These reports have consistently shown that, when available, targeted neonatal echocardiography is commonly used by neonatal clinicians in a number of cardiorespiratory disorders, often leads to changes in clinical management, Kadivar et al 19 Retrospective study of 241 neonates who underwent echocardiography performed by neonatologists under supervision of pediatric cardiologists at a single tertiary center. Most common clinical indication was murmurs, followed by extracardiac anomalies/dysmorphic features.…”
Focused cardiac sonography and targeted neonatal echocardiography refer to goal-directed cardiac imaging using ultrasound, typically by noncardiologic specialists. Although the former consists of a rapid qualitative assessment of cardiac function, which is usually performed by acute care practitioners, the latter refers to detailed functional echocardiography to obtain quantitative and qualitative indexes of pulmonary and systemic hemodynamics in sick neonates and is typically performed by neonatologists. Although the use of these modalities is increasing, they still remain unavailable in most North American centers providing acute care to neonates, partly because of limited data regarding their direct impact on patient care. Here we present a series of 5 cases from a large perinatal unit in which immediate availability of relevant expertise led to important and arguably life-saving clinical interventions. In 4 of these cases, focused cardiac sonography was sufficient to make the diagnosis, whereas in 1 case, clinical integration of detailed systemic hemodynamics measured on target neonatal echocardiography was required.
“…Systolic and diastolic left ventricular functions are critical determinants of sepsis-induced cardiovascular disorders. 6,7 Many cellular pathways of left ventricular systolic function are impeded during sepsis and implicated in the active relaxation of the left ventricle. 8 In our study, preterm neonates with clinical sepsis had temperature instability, respiratory (grunting, retraction, apnea, tachypnea, or cyanosis), gastrointestinal (feeding intolerance or abdominal distention), neurologic (hypotonia, lethargy, seizures), cardiovascular (bradycardia, tachycardia, poor perfusion, or hypotension), or hematology (thrombocytopenia, prolonged coagulation time, bleeding, or anemia) problems.…”
Background Hemodynamic instability in sepsis, especially in the neonatal population, is one of the leading causes of death in hospitalized infants. The major contribution for heart dysfunction in neonatal sepsis is the myocardial dysfunction that leads to decreasing of ventricular function. The combination of echocardiography and laboratory findings help us to understand the ventricular condition in preterm infants with sepsis.Objective To assess for a correlation between ventricular function and serum high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) level in preterm infants with neonatal sepsis.
“…Neonates with nonurgent problems are assessed in the daily outpatient clinics, while those with moderately severe clinical problems may need transfer for diagnostic clarification or advice on management. [3]…”
Background:Outreach echocardiographic services led by cardiac sonographers may help district level hospitals in the management of patients suspected to have cardiac anomalies. However, the safety and utility of such an approach is not tested.Methods:We retrospectively reviewed our experience of patients seen in the outreach visits by the echocardiographers alone and subsequently reviewed in the pediatric cardiology clinic. Comparison between the diagnosis made by the echocardiographer and the consultant pediatric cardiologist were done. We defined safety as no change in patient management plan between the outreach evaluation and the pediatric cardiology clinic evaluation, and we defined usefulness as being beneficial, serviceable and of practical use.Results:Two senior echocardiographic technicians did 41 clinic visits and over a period of 17 months, 623 patients were seen. Patients less than 3 months of age constitute 63% of the total patients seen. Normal echocardiographic examinations were found in 342 (55%) of patients. These patients were not seen in our cardiology clinic. Abnormal echocardiographic examinations were found in 281 (45%) of patients. Among the 281 patients with abnormal echos in the outreach visits, 251 patients (89.3%) were seen in the pediatric cardiology clinic. Comparing the results of the outreach clinic evaluation to that of the pediatric cardiology clinic, 73 patients (29%) diagnosed to have a minor CHD turned to have normal echocardiographic examinations. In all patients seen in both the outreach clinics and the pediatric tertiary cardiac clinics there was no change in patient's management plan.Conclusions:Outreach clinic conducted by pediatric echo sonographers could be useful and safe. It may help in reducing unnecessary visits to pediatric cardiology clinics, provide parental reassurance, and help in narrowing the differential diagnosis in critically ill patient unable to be transferred to tertiary cardiac centers provided it is done by experienced echosonographers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.