2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2005.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Echocardiographic Indices of Increased Left Ventricular Filling Pressure and Dilation After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
40
2
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
40
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore LA usually needs more time to adapt to high LV illing pressures than LV, as evidenced in patients with mitral valve regurgitation. In contrast to our indings there are some reports, where no association between LA volume and further LV remodeling was found post MI and that might probably be due to the relative short follow-up period [23].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore LA usually needs more time to adapt to high LV illing pressures than LV, as evidenced in patients with mitral valve regurgitation. In contrast to our indings there are some reports, where no association between LA volume and further LV remodeling was found post MI and that might probably be due to the relative short follow-up period [23].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…14,15,28,29 Hills et al have shown that E/E' predicts LV remodeling and prognosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction. 14,30 More recently, we demonstrated that E/E' predicted mortality of the non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients, irrespective of their S function. 15 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…[11][12][13] However, no reports have been published about the functional paradox of systolic and diastolic function between patients with ABS and those with AMI. It appears that ABS (also called stress-induced cardiomyopathy) is related to an increase in demand of coronary flow or catecholamine, whereas AMI is related to a reduced supply of coronary flow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%