2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.12.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Echocardiographic Findings in Stable Outpatients with Properly Functioning HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We next evaluated currently accepted echocardiographic and clinical values of heart failure in the CF-LVADsupported patient group both before and after LVAD implantation (Table III). Consistent with the medical literature, 18,19 the LV end-diastolic and end-systolic dimensions and estimated pulmonary artery pressures decreased by approximately 20% to 30% after LVAD implantation (P <0.001). The EPSS decreased an average of 28.5% (from 2.5 to 1.8 cm) after LVAD implantation (P <0.0001).…”
Section: Demographic Characteristics Of the Lvad Study Populationsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We next evaluated currently accepted echocardiographic and clinical values of heart failure in the CF-LVADsupported patient group both before and after LVAD implantation (Table III). Consistent with the medical literature, 18,19 the LV end-diastolic and end-systolic dimensions and estimated pulmonary artery pressures decreased by approximately 20% to 30% after LVAD implantation (P <0.001). The EPSS decreased an average of 28.5% (from 2.5 to 1.8 cm) after LVAD implantation (P <0.0001).…”
Section: Demographic Characteristics Of the Lvad Study Populationsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Upon LVAD implantation, the E/e′ value significantly decreased from 19.4 ± 8.72 to 13.3 ± 10.91 (P=0.0042), which was similar to a published observation in hemodynamically stable outpatients. 19 The before-LVAD E/e′ ratio correlated significantly with the SLAM (r= -0.409, P=0.0119), although the after-LVAD E/e′ did not (r= -0.249, P=0.1631). After LVAD implantation, the mean SLAM of patients increased in steepness from 7.3 ± 2.44 to 14.7 ± 5.01 cm/s (n=42; P <0.0001) at a mean of 11 months after implantation (range, 5 d-47 mo) (Fig.…”
Section: Demographic Characteristics Of the Lvad Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In general, incremental rotation speed or fluid replacement may be effective in ameliorating low output during LVAD support. 32 In patients with late-onset RVF, incremental rotation speed did not…”
Section: Mechanisms For Late-onset Rvf After Lvad Implantationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study of 63 stable outpatients with normalfunctioning HM II devices noted that efficient LV unloading was associated with a 17% reduction in LV end-diastolic diameter 3 months after LVAD implantation (5.6Ϯ1.1 versus 6.8Ϯ0.9 cm pre-LVAD). 5 Although LV volumes provide a more accurate assessment of LV size, their accurate measurement, unlike LV dimensions, can be challenging from the standard apical view because of the apical inflow cannula and its associated shadowing/attenuation artifact, in addition to echocardiographic dropout at the apex. Because of these limitations, ventricular volumes can be underestimated when assessed by echocardiography.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Ventricular Size and Function By Echocardiogramentioning
confidence: 99%