1985
DOI: 10.1016/0167-5273(85)90218-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Echocardiographic evaluation after blunt trauma of the chest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[17,18] ECHO findings were normal in 65% (n=65) of cases, while abnormal ECHO findings were revealed in 31% (n=31) in the present series. The most common finding was ventricular wall motion abnormality as detected in 20% of cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…[17,18] ECHO findings were normal in 65% (n=65) of cases, while abnormal ECHO findings were revealed in 31% (n=31) in the present series. The most common finding was ventricular wall motion abnormality as detected in 20% of cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…showed a concordance between important cardiac complications and abnormal ECG findings [16] . Previous studies report a high likelihood of abnormal FAST results, ECG findings, and myocardial markers in patients with cardiac injuries secondary to chest trauma [17,18] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In one study, 87% of patients with BCI had wall motion abnormalities [17]. Unfortunately, ECHO may be difficult to perform in the acute setting because of chest wall tenderness, inability to position the patient optimally, and the presence of pneumothorax or hemothorax, resulting in a poor quality study [18,19]. For this reason it should be considered a complementary, not a definitive, test [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%