2024
DOI: 10.1186/s44156-023-00036-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Echocardiographic assessment of aortic regurgitation: a narrative review

Vasiliki Tsampasian,
Kelly Victor,
Sanjeev Bhattacharyya
et al.

Abstract: Aortic regurgitation (AR) is the third most frequently encountered valve lesion and may be caused by abnormalities of the valve cusps or the aorta. Echocardiography is instrumental in the assessment of AR as it enables the delineation of valvular morphology, the mechanism of the lesion and the grading of severity. Severe AR has a major impact on the myocardium and carries a significant risk of morbidity and mortality if left untreated. Established and novel echocardiographic methods, such as global longitudina… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the Doppler volumetric method used to calculate RegF is time-consuming and susceptible to multiple small measurement errors, which can result in substantial overall inaccuracies. The potential for error accumulation using a multi-variable equation to calculate EROA makes this method less advisable for individuals without a high level of echocardiographic experience and, thus, has significant limitations in routine clinical practice [25]. Therefore, no single measurement of Doppler parameters is sufficiently precise to quantify AR in individual patients; thus, an integration of multiple parameters is required [32,33].…”
Section: Quantitative Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the Doppler volumetric method used to calculate RegF is time-consuming and susceptible to multiple small measurement errors, which can result in substantial overall inaccuracies. The potential for error accumulation using a multi-variable equation to calculate EROA makes this method less advisable for individuals without a high level of echocardiographic experience and, thus, has significant limitations in routine clinical practice [25]. Therefore, no single measurement of Doppler parameters is sufficiently precise to quantify AR in individual patients; thus, an integration of multiple parameters is required [32,33].…”
Section: Quantitative Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, holodiastolic flow reversal in the abdominal aorta is also a specific sign of severe AR. However, these methods can be influenced by the diastolic period, aortic distensibility, and dilatation [25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%