2014
DOI: 10.1161/jaha.114.000981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ECG Morphological Variability in Beat Space for Risk Stratification After Acute Coronary Syndrome

Abstract: BackgroundIdentification of patients who are at high risk of adverse cardiovascular events after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains a major challenge in clinical cardiology. We hypothesized that quantifying variability in electrocardiogram (ECG) morphology may improve risk stratification post‐ACS.Methods and ResultsWe developed a new metric to quantify beat‐to‐beat morphologic changes in the ECG: morphologic variability in beat space (MVB), and compared our metric to published ECG metrics (heart rate var… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Frequency domain HRV metrics have been shown to provide useful prognostic information after a myocardial infarction in multiple studies 2 3 4 5 6 7 and after NSTEACS 17 18 . However, though frequency HRV measures are associated with elevated risk after NSTEACS, these risk measures miss significant numbers of deaths 18 . Our results suggest that quantifying LF/HF in terms of beatquency instead of frequency improves the ability to identify high-risk patients after a NSTEACS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Frequency domain HRV metrics have been shown to provide useful prognostic information after a myocardial infarction in multiple studies 2 3 4 5 6 7 and after NSTEACS 17 18 . However, though frequency HRV measures are associated with elevated risk after NSTEACS, these risk measures miss significant numbers of deaths 18 . Our results suggest that quantifying LF/HF in terms of beatquency instead of frequency improves the ability to identify high-risk patients after a NSTEACS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beatquency LF/HF was also obtained from the power spectrum of the heart rate time series, however, the heartbeat indices were used as the “temporal” reference. Where beats or parts of the signal were removed (as described in the previous section), the number of removed beats was estimated using the average time intervals of the heartbeats immediately adjacent to the gap 18 . As mentioned in the results section, diagnostic bands for beatquency LF/HF were based on a prior study that applied LF and HF beatquency bands to normal adults as well as those with coronary artery disease and congestive heart failure: 0.03 to 0.14 (LF band) and 0.14 to 0.40 cycles/beat (HF band) 14 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Autonomic (P&S and HRV) measures have been documented to be associated with LVEF and cardiovascular risk ( 32 ). Table VI presents the P&S and LVEF data without regard to clinical outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%