2017
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/aa5feb
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ECG derived respiration: comparison of time-domain approaches and application to altered breathing patterns of patients with schizophrenia

Abstract: In life-threatening diseases and in several clinical interventions, monitoring of vital parameters is essential to guarantee the safety of patients. Besides monitoring the electrocardiogram (ECG), it is helpful to assess respiratory activity. If the respiration signal itself is not recorded, it can be extracted from the ECG (i.e. ECG derived respiration, EDR). In the present paper, we compared six EDR approaches, namely RS-decline quantified by central moments, respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), R-wave amplit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Respiration – ECG-derived respiration was calculated with Kubios HRV Premium (University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland) 62 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respiration – ECG-derived respiration was calculated with Kubios HRV Premium (University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland) 62 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean breathing rate was evaluated as the central frequency of the power spectrum of ECG-derived respiration (EDR) signal. The EDR signal reflects the respiratory movements of the thorax as modulations of the amplitude of the QRS complex (Schmidt et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breath-by-breath fR analysis during sleep demonstrated an error of 1.8 ± 2.7 bpm when compared to reference data (i.e., by an airflow method) [12]. Experiments on healthy subjects at rest showed a bias of 0.75 ± 2.86 bpm when compared to reference data (i.e., by a wearable system embedding resistive sensors) [243]. The estimation of fR derived from a single-channel ECG wearable device has been demonstrated feasible when tested on 67 subjects during real-life activities (e.g., office, households and sports), with a bias of ∼0.3 ± 3 bpm [244].…”
Section: Techniques Based On the Modulation Of Cardiac Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%