2019
DOI: 10.1109/tbcas.2019.2948920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ECG Classification Algorithm Based on STDP and R-STDP Neural Networks for Real-Time Monitoring on Ultra Low-Power Personal Wearable Devices

Abstract: This paper presents a novel ECG classification algorithm for real-time cardiac monitoring on ultra low-power wearable devices. The proposed solution is based on spiking neural networks which are the third generation of neural networks. In specific, we employ spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP), and reward-modulated STDP (R-STDP), in which the model weights are trained according to the timings of spike signals, and reward or punishment signals. Experiments show that the proposed solution is suitable for re… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, these approaches require no ECG segmentation, or only QRS detection (a simple task as mentioned earlier), and are more robust to ECG noise [ 140 ], [ 141 ]. Deep learning-based methods have also been carefully optimized and can be deployed into mainstream wearable devices for real-time heartbeats screening [ 142 ], [ 143 ].…”
Section: Early Warning and Dysfunction Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, these approaches require no ECG segmentation, or only QRS detection (a simple task as mentioned earlier), and are more robust to ECG noise [ 140 ], [ 141 ]. Deep learning-based methods have also been carefully optimized and can be deployed into mainstream wearable devices for real-time heartbeats screening [ 142 ], [ 143 ].…”
Section: Early Warning and Dysfunction Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two widely used statistical measures of F1 score and G score adopted in [7] are listed to synthetically estimate the Sen and Ppr. An overall performance comparison between the proposed algorithm and other advanced patient-specific methods [7], [12], [13], [21] are shown in Table 3. Our classification performance of V beats is comparable to existing methods, while the classification performance of S beats is more outstanding than others.…”
Section: Algorithm Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Sen, F1 and G of the S beats classification are the best among all. It is worth mentioning that the [21] proposes an efficient low-power design for neural network based ECG classification. However, it only achieves four-class (N, V, F, and Q) heartbeat recognition, and the classification accuracy of V can still be improved further.…”
Section: Algorithm Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies have been conducted using computer-aided detection (CADe) to precisely forecast arrhythmia in order to enhance diagnostic efficiency. [6], [7], [8]. Thus, This work aims to early alerts for unusual disorders may be given by creating a computational framework focused on machine learning that rapidly, correctly, and consistently diagnose cardiac arrhythmia such that qualified doctors can provide appropriate care.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%