1984
DOI: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.1984.tb01478.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eccrine Porocarcinoma

Abstract: The histological, electron microscopic, and immunological findings in a case of eccrine porocarcinoma are described. The tumors were verrucous, wart‐like lesions and nodules which ulcerated secondarily. They were located on the leg. The patient died in a few months from dissemination of the disease. The tumor examined was epidermotropic and mainly composed of a clear cell proliferation. Ultrastructurally, the cells showed large, nucleolated nuclei, numerous mitochondria, dilated endoplasmic reticulum, single d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, several immunohistochemical markers have been proposed to distinguish benign and malignant poroid tumors from their differential diagnoses. Indeed, epithelial membrane antigen is expressed in poroma cells, and carcinoembryonic antigen highlights the ductal structures 8–10. In addition, several other markers have been described with variable diagnostic performance 10…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this context, several immunohistochemical markers have been proposed to distinguish benign and malignant poroid tumors from their differential diagnoses. Indeed, epithelial membrane antigen is expressed in poroma cells, and carcinoembryonic antigen highlights the ductal structures 8–10. In addition, several other markers have been described with variable diagnostic performance 10…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, epithelial membrane antigen is expressed in poroma cells, and carcinoembryonic antigen highlights the ductal structures. [8][9][10] In addition, several other markers have been described with variable diagnostic performance. 10 Recently, Sekine et al 11 have reported recurrent YAP1-MAML2 and YAP1-NUTM1 fusion transcripts in poroma and porocarcinoma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have performed immunohistochemical staining using carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), and S-100 protein. CEA and EMA were positive in the intraepidermal ductal cell, and S-100 protein was negative [8]. Histologically, when the tumor cells are localized within the epidermis, it is necessary to differentiate from hidroacanthoma simplex, Bowen’s disease, seborrheic keratosis among others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nuestro caso presentó tumoración con patrón infiltrante a dermis, células redondas pleomorficas, atipia nuclear, que conformaban estructuras lobulares y en nidos con 12 mitosis x campo de alta potencia, e infiltración vascular y linfática. Existen casos que requieren otras tinciones para su diferenciación, para lo cual se solicitan estudios inmunohistoquímicos con expresión de citoqueratinas, antígeno de membrana epitelial, y antígeno carcinoembrionario (13) . Según el estudio inmunohistoquímico nuestro caso fue positivo para las tinciones de citoqueratina AE1/AE3 y EMA; y negativos para las tinciones CEA, y citoqueratina 7.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified