2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ECCO Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care: Colorectal Cancer. A critical review

Abstract: ECCO essential requirements for quality cancer care (ERQCC) are checklists and explanations of organisation and actions that are necessary to give high-quality care to patients who have a specific tumour type. They are written by European experts representing all disciplines involved in cancer care. ERQCC papers give oncology teams, patients, policymakers and managers an overview of the elements needed in any healthcare system to provide high quality of care throughout the patient journey. References are made … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We retrieved 13 guidelines focused on colorectal cancer treatment representing all the continents [54e66], documenting also from this analysis a prevalence of American reports (30.7%), consistently with the language selection criteria adopted for this search. Although two guidelines were uninformative regarding MIS and recommendation for clinical practice [55,56], the vast majority of scientific societies recommend the use of laparoscopic resection for colon cancer based on the surgeon's documented experience as well as on patient-and tumor-specific factors. Indeed, the main concern of scientific group were: surgeon's training, transverse tumor and resection of metastatic disease/ bulky tumor if a curative resection can be achieved using open approach.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We retrieved 13 guidelines focused on colorectal cancer treatment representing all the continents [54e66], documenting also from this analysis a prevalence of American reports (30.7%), consistently with the language selection criteria adopted for this search. Although two guidelines were uninformative regarding MIS and recommendation for clinical practice [55,56], the vast majority of scientific societies recommend the use of laparoscopic resection for colon cancer based on the surgeon's documented experience as well as on patient-and tumor-specific factors. Indeed, the main concern of scientific group were: surgeon's training, transverse tumor and resection of metastatic disease/ bulky tumor if a curative resection can be achieved using open approach.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most importantly, the vast majority of surgeons came from high volume institutions, had a significant rate of laparoscopic procedure/year and a minimal conversion rate. Most importantly, the greater percentages of their affiliation met the most recent ECCO recommendations regarding the minimum number of surgeons to be involved in colorectal cancer care (>2 surgeons) [56].…”
Section: Greecementioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, many hospitals that have so-called specialist cancer services are not organised into multidisciplinary units, as recommended by ECCO and other professional societies [35e37]. To this end, ECCO is currently developing essential standards to ensure a more consistent level of quality within designated specialised centres, looking specifically at colorectal cancer and bone and soft-tissue sarcomas [38,39].…”
Section: Local Uptakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Colorectal cancer (CRC) is estimated to be the third most common cancer disease in males and the second most common in females worldwide (Ferlay et al., ). CRC is primarily treated with surgery; radiation and chemotherapy are possible additional treatments (Beets et al., ). The hospital time after surgery for uncomplicated CRC is about 1 week (Varadhan et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%