Ecclesiology

Brodd, Sven-Erik

doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8265-8_343

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The concept of karma and past actions influencing the present is pivotal in Bhartiya psychology (Brodd, 2003;Rao, 2005;Timmins et al, 2022). Inherent of past negative associations in patients could trigger subconscious karma-related beliefs, potentially leading to classical conditioning of negative outcomes, despite their beliefs in optimism (refer subsection 5; karma).…”

Section: Further Insights Into Nocebo -Placebo Effectmentioning

confidence: 99%

Placebo–Placebo, Nocebo–Nocebo, Placebo–Nocebo, and Nocebo–Placebo Effects: A Review of Eastern and Western Perspectives

JARALI

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study examined placebo and nocebo effects, characterized by classical conditioning, operant conditioning, and expectancy effects. The placebo–placebo and nocebo–nocebo effects can be categorized to function independently, including the influence of various factors such as pill color, size, genetics (including other biological factors), branding, the demeanor of healthcare providers, and treatment settings and also considering beyond science understandings (spiritual perspective). To enhance understanding and optimize treatment outcomes, these effects can be categorized under classical conditioning, operant conditioning, and expectancy effect as follows in dominating pre-dominants of nature and beliefs ranging in the respective involuted evolutionary probability of occurrence: 1) placebo–placebo effect, driven by optimistic nature and belief leading to pure placebo effect which can be divided into double placebo and yogic placebo effect; 2) nocebo–nocebo effect, influenced by a pessimistic nature and belief leading to pure nocebo effect which can be divided into double nocebo and vamamarya nocebo effect; 3) placebo–nocebo effect, where optimism nature counters pessimistic belief, resulting in a impure placebo effect; and 4) nocebo–placebo effect, where pessimistic nature undermines optimistic belief, leading to a impure nocebo effect; understanding that not an individual will go through only one of the categories discussed here. It is recommended that future studies adopt this categorization and consider adjusting the definitions of placebo and nocebo to accommodate Eastern and Western (Universal) perspectives.

show abstract

Section: Further Insights Into Nocebo -Placebo Effectmentioning

confidence: 99%

Placebo–Placebo, Nocebo–Nocebo, Placebo–Nocebo, and Nocebo–Placebo Effects: A Review of Eastern and Western Perspectives

JARALI

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Furthermore, the Absolute is in a constant, dynamic state of change. With an ontological unity of both divine and mundane elements in the universe, there is no actual differentiation among apparently individual parts, as in the Hindu understanding of Brahman (Watanabe, 2009) or the Buddhist understanding of Tao Te Ching (Brodd, 2003). It is this complete absorption of both all potentiality and all that exists that gives rise to the label “ontology of abundance” in contemporary philosophy and political theory (Tønder & Thomassen, 2005).…”

Section: What Is Ontology?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Competing Ontologies: A Redux Primer for Public Administration

Stout

Love

2021

The American Review of Public Administration

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the last decade, a growing number of public administration theorists have taken up the question of how ontology—assumptions about the nature of existence—shapes our understanding of governance. This substantially updated primer, originally published in Public Administration Review, introduces the essay, provides a basic explanation of ontology, describes the fundamental debates in philosophies of ontology, and discusses why ontology is important to social and political theory and therefore public administration theory and practice. Using an ideal-type approach grounded in differing ontological assumptions, a Governance Typology is provided to support analysis of differing public administration theories. An integrative approach to governance is offered that is grounded in relational process ontology—a foundation that may support a viable synthesis of the other four primary ideal-types. The essay concludes with a call for personal reflection on the part of scholars and practitioners regarding their own ontological commitments and an invitation to collaborative inquiry.

show abstract

Ecclesiology

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Placebo–Placebo, Nocebo–Nocebo, Placebo–Nocebo, and Nocebo–Placebo Effects: A Review of Eastern and Western Perspectives

Placebo–Placebo, Nocebo–Nocebo, Placebo–Nocebo, and Nocebo–Placebo Effects: A Review of Eastern and Western Perspectives

Competing Ontologies: A Redux Primer for Public Administration

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About