2010
DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/50/11/115008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ECCD calculations in ITER by means of the quasi-optical code

Abstract: Electron cyclotron current drive (ECCD) calculations for the case of the ITER electron cyclotron resonant heating upper port launcher are presented making use of a quasi-optical (QO) code (Balakin et al 2008 Nucl. Fusion 48 065003). The QO code describes accurately the behaviour of the wave beam in the electron cyclotron resonance layer, taking into account spatial inhomogeneity and dispersion. The ECCD efficiency is obtained using the adjoint calculation as presented b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(87 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it has been observed experimentally Harvey et al (2002); Coda et al (2003); Kirov et al (2002) that the deposition can actually be larger than expected from ECCD/ECRH modeling. This can be due to cross-field diffusion of the fast electrons density (constituting the EC current), for instance because of turbulence on the deposition location, leading to a broadening of the driven current density deposition and therefore to a reduction in the maximum driven current density Giruzzi and Fidone (1989); Giruzzi (1993); Coda et al (2006); Bertelli and Westerhof (2009) ;Bertelli et al (2010). It has also been shown that the electron density fluctuations near the plasma edge, or along the path of the RF-waves, might lead to a broadening of the current deposition as well as a fluctuating power deposition profile Tsironis et al (2009) ;Peysson et al (2011); Decker, J. et al (2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has been observed experimentally Harvey et al (2002); Coda et al (2003); Kirov et al (2002) that the deposition can actually be larger than expected from ECCD/ECRH modeling. This can be due to cross-field diffusion of the fast electrons density (constituting the EC current), for instance because of turbulence on the deposition location, leading to a broadening of the driven current density deposition and therefore to a reduction in the maximum driven current density Giruzzi and Fidone (1989); Giruzzi (1993); Coda et al (2006); Bertelli and Westerhof (2009) ;Bertelli et al (2010). It has also been shown that the electron density fluctuations near the plasma edge, or along the path of the RF-waves, might lead to a broadening of the current deposition as well as a fluctuating power deposition profile Tsironis et al (2009) ;Peysson et al (2011); Decker, J. et al (2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…broadening of the EC profiles due to aberration has been found in the range between 10-20% [18]. The broadening occurs when dispersive absorption causes the damping of different wave vectors at different locations [19].…”
Section: Broadening Of the Ec Deposition Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same beam settings are used by Bertelli et al to approximate the Gaussian beam profile near the 170 GHz EC resonance. [17] The detection capabilities of a line-of-sight ECE system on a UPL are addressed in this section.…”
Section: Line-of-sight Ecementioning
confidence: 99%