2014
DOI: 10.1186/1751-0473-9-19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EC2KEGG: a command line tool for comparison of metabolic pathways

Abstract: BackgroundNext-generation sequencing and metagenome projects yield a large number of new genomes that need further annotations, such as identification of enzymes and metabolic pathways, or analysis of metabolic strategies of newly sequenced species in comparison to known organisms. While methods for enzyme identification are available, development of the command line tools for high-throughput comparative analysis and visualization of identified enzymes is lagging.MethodsA set of perl scripts has been developed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although microalgal species clustered tightly according to their clades and habitats in our Pfam analyses, biclustering based on EC (Enzyme Commission) assignments (Alborzi et al., 2017) within Kyoto Encyclopedia for Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways (Data S5) (Porollo, 2014) was inconsistent with Pfam-only biclustering, and species from the same clade did not always cluster together (Figure 4). This discrepancy between our Pfam analyses and KEGG pathway analyses could partially result from the distance each descriptor has to experimental evidence of function.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Although microalgal species clustered tightly according to their clades and habitats in our Pfam analyses, biclustering based on EC (Enzyme Commission) assignments (Alborzi et al., 2017) within Kyoto Encyclopedia for Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways (Data S5) (Porollo, 2014) was inconsistent with Pfam-only biclustering, and species from the same clade did not always cluster together (Figure 4). This discrepancy between our Pfam analyses and KEGG pathway analyses could partially result from the distance each descriptor has to experimental evidence of function.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Shared metabolic capacity among NJAY, AY-WB and OY-M was determined in two manners: the first utilized existing annotations for AY-WB and OY-M, and the second involved reannotating genic content for these two reference taxa. Prodigal-predicted NJAY protein sequences were annotated using Blast2GO [ 42 ], from which Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers were extracted and compared in pairwise fashion with each of AY-WB and OY-M using the EC2KEGG program [ 43 ]. The Prodigal gene finder was then run independently on AY-WB and OY-M, and resultant protein sequences were assigned EC numbers using Blast2GO.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional annotation was carried out using Blast2GO 2.8.0 (Conesa et al, 2005 ). Statistical analysis of KEGG pathways was carried out using EC2KEGG (Porollo, 2014 ) and full results are shown in Table S5 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%