2001
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199247790.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EC Membership and the Judicialization of British Politics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27, J.O. 2161/64, 11 August 1964 Analysis of parliamentary debates during British accession to the EC is also compatible with the view that the UK government accepted the supremacy and direct effect of European law (while publically downplaying or neglecting the potential empowerment of UK domestic courts) in order to gain the economic benefits of pervasive trade liberalization (Nicol, 2001). I thank a JCMS referee for bringing this example to my attention.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…27, J.O. 2161/64, 11 August 1964 Analysis of parliamentary debates during British accession to the EC is also compatible with the view that the UK government accepted the supremacy and direct effect of European law (while publically downplaying or neglecting the potential empowerment of UK domestic courts) in order to gain the economic benefits of pervasive trade liberalization (Nicol, 2001). I thank a JCMS referee for bringing this example to my attention.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…2161/64, 11 August 1964 Analysis of parliamentary debates during British accession to the EC is also compatible with the view that the UK government accepted the supremacy and direct effect of European law (while publically downplaying or neglecting the potential empowerment of UK domestic courts) in order to gain the economic benefits of pervasive trade liberalization (Nicol, 2001). It argues that the development of European law benefitted export-orientated businesses by prohibiting inter-state retaliation and unilateral safeguard mechanisms; that the effective suppression of such common (if trade-disrupting and inefficient) trade politics behaviours was one of the Court's direct objectives when 14 Reply to written question No.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Not surprisingly, EU citizens rushed to obtain permanent residence cards, which-as per Directive 2004/38/EC-have merely a declaratory character. 33 Yet, under the circumstances, many applicants believed that the cards in question guaranteed an additional safety net at very uncertain times. It is notable that issuing of permanent residence cards is left in the hands of the Member States, while Directive 2004/38/EC provides only a very general framework.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a commentary see, inter alia, Emerson [11]. 33 35 See Warrel [42]. Some EU citizens opted for naturalisation in order to make sure that their rights are protected.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation