1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-3019(96)90802-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EC-IC bypass 10 years later: Is it valuable?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the EC-IC Bypass Study in 1985, 20 the use of extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery for occlusion of the ICA has been highly controversial. 21,22 A number of studies have shown that patients with an exhausted VMR are at an increased risk of cerebral ischemia. [23][24][25][26] After extracranialintracranial bypass surgery, the previously impaired cerebrovascular and oxygen metabolic reserve is normalized.…”
Section: Rohrberg and Brodhun Transcranial Doppler-co 2 Test And Levomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the EC-IC Bypass Study in 1985, 20 the use of extracranial-intracranial bypass surgery for occlusion of the ICA has been highly controversial. 21,22 A number of studies have shown that patients with an exhausted VMR are at an increased risk of cerebral ischemia. [23][24][25][26] After extracranialintracranial bypass surgery, the previously impaired cerebrovascular and oxygen metabolic reserve is normalized.…”
Section: Rohrberg and Brodhun Transcranial Doppler-co 2 Test And Levomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extracranial-intracranial bypass has been repeatedly shown to be a useful tool in the armamentarium of the vascular neurosurgeon (3,13). Extracranial-intracranial revascularization with the STA, radial artery, or SV provides preservation of flow and demonstrates good long-term patency rates.…”
Section: Interposition Grafts and Aneurysmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] Since then the operation has been largely abandoned throughout the world. [2] At this time there is no treatment of proven value for these patients other than antithrombotic medication and vigorous control of vascular risk factors. It has been suggested that the EC=IC bypass trial has failed because of inclusion of wrong patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%