2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EBSD study of micromechanisms involved in high deformation ability of DP steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(41 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was in the range of 1800–2400 MPa. By using a similar method, the interface strength was calculated to be 2100 MPa for DP780 steel . This value was rather high compared to ferrite–cementite interface strength in common low carbon steels with interface strengths of 1200–1300 MPa .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It was in the range of 1800–2400 MPa. By using a similar method, the interface strength was calculated to be 2100 MPa for DP780 steel . This value was rather high compared to ferrite–cementite interface strength in common low carbon steels with interface strengths of 1200–1300 MPa .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[ 6,34,38 ] Deformation of second hard phase martensite within the microstructure of DP steel is considered as a relaxation mechanism. [ 39 ] Therefore, the lower effect of V M on the UTS than the YS can be justified by deformation of low carbon martensite grains and their relaxation effect opposing the strain hardening, on overall deformation behavior.…”
Section: Developments On the Design Of The Microstructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, it is expected that the smaller ferrite grain size would result in the smaller strain gradient, inside the ferrite grains. It was showed that the greater uniformity of strain distribution within the microstructure will result in superior material formability; [ 39 ] the finer grain size would enhance the YS and strain hardening rate of ferrite matrix which, in turn, would lead to rapid transfer of stress to adjacent martensite grains; this would lead to increase in macroscopic strain hardening.…”
Section: Developments On the Design Of The Microstructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17] Ramazani et al 15) reported that the high dislocation density zone in the surrounding of martensite particles was detected using EBSD with kernel average misorientation (KAM) map. Saeidi et al 16) showed that the higher dislocations created within the smaller grains themselves as sub-boundaries. However, there have been few reports about quantitative evaluation of void formation in dispersed cementite steels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%