EBLIP: bridging the language barrier

Declève, Ghislaine

doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2010.00914.x

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 4 publications

(5 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Research in physician practice has identified that reading articles in a non-native language may result in lower comprehension and may also require increased time to read the article [ 36 ]. Other studies have indicated that clinicians often prefer to read articles published in journals of their native language [ 37 ]. While none of these articles specifically evaluated barriers for native Norwegian speakers, data from this project indicate that language may also be a barrier in this context.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…While none of these articles specifically evaluated barriers for native Norwegian speakers, data from this project indicate that language may also be a barrier in this context. More research on this possible barrier needs to be conducted, especially since the majority of peer-reviewed articles are published in English [ 37 ]. In addition, research on ways to overcome this barrier for non-native English speakers should be conducted to facilitate use of evidence in practice.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A qualitative study exploring contributors to the success of a community of practice in rehabilitation

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Communities of Practice (CoPs) focus on learning, knowledge sharing, and creation, and research indicates they can improve healthcare performance. This article describes the development of a CoP that focused on synthesizing and adapting evidence in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R). This study aimed to investigate the CoP members’ experiences and perceived barriers and enablers of CoP success in the early phase of a CoP. Methods Physical therapists and a physician (n = 10) volunteered for a CoP that synthesized literature of PM&R evidence. CoP members participated in education and training on critical appraisal and knowledge synthesis, practiced critical appraisal skills, and summarized literature. Three months after CoP initiation, semi-structured interviews were conducted to understand the CoP members’ experiences and reflections. Members also completed an online survey that included the Evidence-Based Practice Confidence scale (EPIC), questions related to CoP activities, and demographics before CoP initiation. We utilized the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Model of Behaviour (COM-B) to explore how these experiences related to the behavioral adaptation and participation. Results Ten themes related to the potential contributors to CoP success and failure were identified. These included project management, technological solutions, efficacy, organizational support, interaction, the bigger picture, self-development, time, and motivation. Conclusions Contributors to CoP success may include clearly articulated project goals and participant expectations, education and training, reliable technology solutions, organizational support, face-to-face communication, and good project management. Importantly, CoP members need time to participate in activities.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A qualitative study exploring contributors to the success of a community of practice in rehabilitation

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this section articles were included that traced developments in the EBLIP movement, for example the evolution, principles and future of EBLIP (Booth, 2011b;Eldredge, 2012;Koufogiannakis, 2011Koufogiannakis, , 2012Wilson and Grant, 2013). The Research Scan found several papers emanating from Europe (Decleve, 2010;Johansen, 2012;Johansen and Pors, 2012;Livonen, 2012;Madge, 2011) suggesting the spread of EBLIP across the continent. Nevertheless, how this trend translates to grass roots adoption of EBLIP is difficult to establish.…”

Section: Background Trendsmentioning

confidence: 99%

What is the current state of practitioner research? The 2013 LIRG Research Scan

Woods¹

2014

LIR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper reports on a scoping review commissioned as a research scan by the CILIP Library and Information Research Group (LIRG) and undertaken by a small research team at the School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) at the University of Sheffield. Firstly the recent literature (2010-2012) on LIS practitioner-focused research was identified and briefly reviewed. This was supplemented by an entities scan; that is, a brief scan of key outputs (e.g. newsletters, discussion lists, etcetera) produced by CILIP specialist interest groups (SIGS). The team identified a total of 142 relevant papers. These were coded and characterised against relevant frameworks. A brief selection of items in each category was reviewed. The paper concludes by suggesting priorities to improve practitioner research at practitioner, organisational and strategic level. Particular attention was focused on the stimulation of collaborative “hive” research activities and on monitoring existing good practice from other groups, associations and countries.

show abstract

“…carried out a literature review to identify EBLIP journals and authors. Ten of the 237 articles identified in the review were by an Australian first author 1 . This small number suggests a rather tentative uptake of EBLIP in Australia.…”

mentioning

confidence: 98%

Evidence based library and information practice in Australia: defining skills and knowledge

Lewis¹

2011

Health Information &Amp; Libraries Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This guest feature from Suzanne Lewis, a long-time advocate of evidence based library and information practice (EBLIP) in Australia, discusses a current trend within the movement that focuses on the skills, knowledge and competencies of health librarians. In particular, the feature describes three specific Australia-based research projects, on expert searching, indigenous health and future skills requirements for the health library workforce respectively, that exemplify this trend. These projects illustrate how the evidence base can be strengthened around the skills and knowledge required to deliver services that continue to meet the changing needs of health library and information users. AB

show abstract

EBLIP: bridging the language barrier

Cited by 3 publications

References 4 publications

A qualitative study exploring contributors to the success of a community of practice in rehabilitation

A qualitative study exploring contributors to the success of a community of practice in rehabilitation

What is the current state of practitioner research? The 2013 LIRG Research Scan

Evidence based library and information practice in Australia: defining skills and knowledge

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About