2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-583x(03)00943-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EBIT diagnostics using X-ray spectra of highly ionized Ne

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decreasing electron density below 3.4 keV is due to the lower beam current in the EBIT at low beam energies, while, above 3.4 keV, the velocity of the electrons increases as a function of beam energy with beam current remaining fairly unchanged. The normalization factor is consistent with the previous diagnostics on the NIST EBIT [35] using neon line ratios and the HULLAC code, assuming a beam radius of 35 microns and a factor of 4.6 effective density reduction due to heating of the ion cloud to significantly larger diameter than that of the electron beam [36]. The gas injection pressure was changed and the EBIT was retuned [16] several times during the experiments which may have resulted in different beam radii and hence explain some of the scatter seen.…”
Section: Effect Of the M1 Transition On Allowed Transition Intensitiessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The decreasing electron density below 3.4 keV is due to the lower beam current in the EBIT at low beam energies, while, above 3.4 keV, the velocity of the electrons increases as a function of beam energy with beam current remaining fairly unchanged. The normalization factor is consistent with the previous diagnostics on the NIST EBIT [35] using neon line ratios and the HULLAC code, assuming a beam radius of 35 microns and a factor of 4.6 effective density reduction due to heating of the ion cloud to significantly larger diameter than that of the electron beam [36]. The gas injection pressure was changed and the EBIT was retuned [16] several times during the experiments which may have resulted in different beam radii and hence explain some of the scatter seen.…”
Section: Effect Of the M1 Transition On Allowed Transition Intensitiessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…From equation (A.2) and the numerical values above, it can be seen that for H-like and He-like Ar exposed to a 9500 eV electron beam of effective current density n e F = 10 12 cm −3 [53,54], and v e /v i = 1400 one is in the strong charge exchange regime when n o ≫ 1.4 × 10 6 cm −3 which corresponds to a room temperature ideal gas pressure of p ≫ n o kT = 5.7 × 10 -11 hPa (4 × 10 −11 torr). This is on the order of typical EBIT base pressures (without any gas injection) and suggests that one is on the threshold of the strong charge exchange regime even when no additional gas is injected for spectroscopy.…”
Section: Pressure For Strong Charge Exchange Regimementioning
confidence: 94%
“…A well established collaborative research program between the research team at the XACT facility and the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory (SAO, Cambridge, MA) is ongoing to develope and optimize high energy resolution X-ray microcalorimeter detectors for laboratory and astrophysical applications 33,34,35,36,37 . Within this collaboration an Adiabatic Demagnetization Refrigerator was designed and built at the XACT facility 16 and the read-out electronics has been set-up to operate simultaneously a four pixel array of microcalorimeters with semiconductor thermistors.…”
Section: Cryogenic Laboratorymentioning
confidence: 99%