2007
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eating styles, overweight and obesity in young adult twins

Abstract: Objective: To explore the association of eating styles with overweight and obesity in young adults, controlling for identical genetic background in monozygotic twins. Design: Prospective twin cohort study. Setting: Finland, 1991. Subjects: Two-hundred and thirty-three women and 2060 men from the FinnTwin16 study, aged 16 years at baseline (T1), and ranging from 22 to 27 years at the time of the nutritional assessment (T4). Methods: Eating styles (Restrictive/overeating, health-conscious, snacking, emotional an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, in overweight individuals, food-cue exposure (i) elicited a stronger salivary response and (ii) evoked larger changes in desire to eat pizza and a non-cued food ('scrambled egg, chips and beans'). These findings are consistent with evidence that snacking and meal variability predict weight gain [43][44][45][46] and they expose 'cue reactiveness' as a potential predisposing factor for overweight.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, in overweight individuals, food-cue exposure (i) elicited a stronger salivary response and (ii) evoked larger changes in desire to eat pizza and a non-cued food ('scrambled egg, chips and beans'). These findings are consistent with evidence that snacking and meal variability predict weight gain [43][44][45][46] and they expose 'cue reactiveness' as a potential predisposing factor for overweight.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This is potentially important, because this sensitivity may encourage snacking behavior and variability in eating habits, and it may promote disinhibited eating, all of which are associated with increased energy intake, overweight and weight gain. [43][44][45][46] In relation to our failure to find differences in intake, one explanation is that the overweight group consciously limited their eating because they felt scrutinized under laboratory conditions. However, the prospect that cue exposure promotes the initiation of a meal and not its size is consistent with the observation that everyday portion sizes are not predicted by BMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we selected individuals who were weight-stable, there may be others who are unable to maintain restraint in the face of physiological appetite stimulation, and they succumb to the overeating, weight cycling, or weight gain that characterize some populations of restrained eaters [6]. In identical twin pairs, a restrictive/overeating eating style predicted excess weight even when genetic background was controlled for [42]. Interestingly, restrained eaters are not consistently found to be in energy deficit [43], as documented by stable lifetime maximum weight in this study and resting energy expenditure in other studies [44][45][46].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information on the frequency of eating breakfast (every morning, about 3-4 mornings a week and once a week or less often) was obtained at all ages, but used only at 16 years. 23 Does dieting make you fat KH Pietiläinen et al Number of children. Information on the number of children (none, one, two or more) was obtained at age 25 years.…”
Section: Confounding Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%