2003
DOI: 10.1017/s1121189x00003109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eating psychopathology and personality in eating disorders

Abstract: In their complex, data suggest and in-deep study aimed to a possible re-classification of EDs which would take impulsiveness in greater consideration. The differences in temperament and character traits may partially be responsible of the repression or discontrol of impulsive eating behaviours in different ED subtypes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(59 reference statements)
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it was not possible to overcome the recall biases consequent to different degrees of awareness and the unavoidable subjectivity of judgement about the parental relationship. Nevertheless present findings are consistent with literature evidences on personality (Fassino et al, 2002) and psychopathology patterns (Bulik et al, 2000;Fassino et al, 2003a) of BN women and add some knowledge in the field of parenting influences on bulimia nervosa.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, it was not possible to overcome the recall biases consequent to different degrees of awareness and the unavoidable subjectivity of judgement about the parental relationship. Nevertheless present findings are consistent with literature evidences on personality (Fassino et al, 2002) and psychopathology patterns (Bulik et al, 2000;Fassino et al, 2003a) of BN women and add some knowledge in the field of parenting influences on bulimia nervosa.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Bulimic women assessed with the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI; Cloninger et al, 1993) are characterised by a specific personality pattern (Fassino et al, 2002), which is extensively related to their eating psychopathology (Fassino et al, 2003a;Picot & Lilenfeld, 2003). Thus, it is possible that personality traits mediate between parental bonding and eating psychopathology in bulimic women.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several factors have been called into question as enhancing treatment resistance: 1) low self-esteem and 2) mood intolerance [65]; 3) perfectionism [65,78]; 4) body experiences [17,125]; 5) general psychopathology [39,56,64]; 6) personality [66-68,72,73,76,79]; 7) interpersonal relationships [65,75]; 8) cognitive inflexibility and 9) avoidance of experience and emotions [29,131,132]; 10) care givers’ expressed emotion [14,62,71,75]; 11) poor problem solving abilities [69];12) scarce social support [64,74]; and 13) reduced relational abilities [39,69,133] (for a review on widely used treatment models see: Hay and colleagues [134]). Evidence on a relationship between dropout, treatment response and both character and temperament [14,67,135] encourages to focus on considering in detail patients’ personality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This psychotherapeutic model was only sporadically tested in literature [68,135] and - although it may look outdated - it could be proposed again in the light of the studies on psychotherapy currently available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, an electrophysiological study of persons with anorexia nervosa reported lower error rates than in controls on a flanker task and reduced error-related negativity, suggesting deficient error detection. 29 Differences across patients with anorexia nervosa and BN in their ability to detect errors, however, may reflect their respective personality characteristics of perfectionism and impulsiveness that distinguish patients with restricting-type from those with binge-type eating disorders 52. Moreover, less activation of the dorsal ACC and prefrontal and parietal cortices accompanied more errors in patients (Figure 5B), indicating that deficient activation in these regions during correct responses (Figure 2C) was associated with less interference (Figure 3B) and the commission of more errors in patients (Figure 5B).…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%