Everyday Multiculturalism 2009
DOI: 10.1057/9780230244474_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eating at the Borders: Culinary Journeys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our empirical results clearly point to the complex character of cosmopolitan consumption (for previous results: Duruz, 2005;Ollivier, 2008;Cappeliez and Johnston, 2013;Meuleman and Savage, 2013). On the one hand, the descriptive empirical evidence has shown that our respondents, though they belong to a nationally very heterogeneous and transnational group, do not exhibit strong cosmopolitan consumption knowledge and tastes, at least according to the measures used.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our empirical results clearly point to the complex character of cosmopolitan consumption (for previous results: Duruz, 2005;Ollivier, 2008;Cappeliez and Johnston, 2013;Meuleman and Savage, 2013). On the one hand, the descriptive empirical evidence has shown that our respondents, though they belong to a nationally very heterogeneous and transnational group, do not exhibit strong cosmopolitan consumption knowledge and tastes, at least according to the measures used.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…This is obviously linked to the idea of a connoisseur mode of cosmopolitan consumption discussed above (Cappeliez and Johnston, 2013) and to Bourdieu's concept of an aesthetic disposition, which upper class and upper middle class consumers apply not only to traditional highbrow items, but also to everyday objects like food or fashion on the one hand and popular culture on the other hand (Bourdieu, 1984: 32-33;Ollivier, 2008). In sum, our measures of cosmopolitanism cover a broad range of preferences and practices: firstly, musical knowledge and preferences relate to the most important form of cultural consumption discussed in the debate on cultural omnivorism (Kern and Peterson, 1996;Peterson, 2005), secondly, we include also everyday mundane forms of consumption, like food, which are still strongly linked to cultural frames (Cappeliez and Johnston, 2013;Duruz, 2005). And finally, we chose to measure the aesthetic disposition of the respondents by focusing on forms of cultural consumption (books and film), where it is rather easy to grasp the mode of cosmopolitan consumption by focusing on the language used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Everyday cosmopolitanism is expressed in moments of interaction across difference, for example, when neighbours exchange home-grown vegetables and recipes (Wise 2009, Hiebert 2002 or gather for driveway discussions (Gow 2005), when school children swap lunches and gifts (Noble 2009), or when women shop and eat together and exchange cooking advice (Duruz 2009). As Semi et al (2009, p. 69) write, focusing on everyday micropractices enables researchers to 'resist the temptation to reify actions, relations and categories'.…”
Section: Beck Insists On a Break With What He Considers The Philosophmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social trust and group-and place-specific culinary specialties strengthen bonds of belonging and sharing among Us who stand apart from Them. Indeed, food and trust are at the core of group identity, be that about ethno-cultural belonging and difference, profession, class, or fashion (Kraut 1979;Goody 1982;Levenstein 1988;Wood 1991;Miles 1993;Duruz 2005). Food and drink also distinguish places and regions from one another and define their identities (Shortridge and Shortridge 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%