2016
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.16.00551
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

easyGWAS: A Cloud-Based Platform for Comparing the Results of Genome-Wide Association Studies

Abstract: The ever-growing availability of high-quality genotypes for a multitude of species has enabled researchers to explore the underlying genetic architecture of complex phenotypes at an unprecedented level of detail using genome-wide association studies (GWAS). The systematic comparison of results obtained from GWAS of different traits opens up new possibilities, including the analysis of pleiotropic effects. Other advantages that result from the integration of multiple GWAS are the ability to replicate GWAS signa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
105
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this is rarely done in the analysis of continuous traits, a few studies have reported associations of heterotic traits with heterozygosity (41)(42)(43)(44)(45). We selected two linear mixed models to search for associations between genotype and phenotype using FaSTLMM software in the easyGWAS framework (46,47). The first model used a standard linear additive SNP encoding, where the homozygous major allele was represented as 0, the heterozygous as 1, and the homozygous minor allele as 2; we refer to it as the "additive model."…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although this is rarely done in the analysis of continuous traits, a few studies have reported associations of heterotic traits with heterozygosity (41)(42)(43)(44)(45). We selected two linear mixed models to search for associations between genotype and phenotype using FaSTLMM software in the easyGWAS framework (46,47). The first model used a standard linear additive SNP encoding, where the homozygous major allele was represented as 0, the heterozygous as 1, and the homozygous minor allele as 2; we refer to it as the "additive model."…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All GWA analyses were conducted using the easyGWAS framework (46). We used a local copy of easyGWAS and custom C/C++ and Python implementations of the FaSTLMM (47) algorithm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cloud platforms such as Amazon web services (AWS), Google Cloud Platform, and Microsoft Azure can be used to develop new tools or extend existing tools to perform large-scale PheWAS in a more efficient and less time-consuming manner. Currently, there are a handful of cloud-based tools to perform GWAS such as Google BigQuery[57], easyGWAS[58] and CloudAssoc[59] but there are none currently available for PheWAS. There are also platforms built upon different clouds that can be used to perform association testing such as DNAnexus[60].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculated the broad-sense heritability (H) and variance (v) of each splice site using a custom R script. GWAS experiments were performed using the easyGWAS 43 and/or GWAPP 44 web portal using the EMMAX/AMM algorithm with a minimum minor allele frequency of 5%, with no transformation of phenotypes.…”
Section: Splise-qtl Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%