2021
DOI: 10.1002/asia.202101214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Easy Fabrication of Amorphous Covalent Organic Nanospheres Using Schiff‐Base Chemistry for Iodine Capture

Abstract: Designing a strategy for easy fabrication of amorphous porous organic polymers (POPs) with regularly nanospherical structure using common chemical raw materials is highly imperative to promote the practical application for iodine capture. Uniform covalent organic nanospheres (CONs), defined as CON-TT, were easily prepared at room temperature via a Schiff base condensation reaction of tri(4aminophenyl) methane (TAPM) and terephthalaldehyde (TPA) catalyzed by acetic acid. The obtained CON-TT exhibits a uniform n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all the above-mentioned cases, surface as well as inclusion-based iodine transfer is likely to occur even with a less porous nature of the framework . From the results of multiphase iodine transfer studies conducted with 1 and 2 , it can be inferred that the uptake values in this work are better than many MOFs, POPs, and zeolites (Table S1) , For instance, the values of vapor phase iodine mass transfer for a T -SCNU-Z6 and a W -SCNU-Z6 are 2.05 g g –1 and 5.04 g g –1 , respectively, whereas, those for HSB-W8 and Co-IPT-IBA are 2.32 g g –1 , and 2.88 g g –1 , respectively. Compared to this, ionic iodine transfer studies in the aqueous phase are rare.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In all the above-mentioned cases, surface as well as inclusion-based iodine transfer is likely to occur even with a less porous nature of the framework . From the results of multiphase iodine transfer studies conducted with 1 and 2 , it can be inferred that the uptake values in this work are better than many MOFs, POPs, and zeolites (Table S1) , For instance, the values of vapor phase iodine mass transfer for a T -SCNU-Z6 and a W -SCNU-Z6 are 2.05 g g –1 and 5.04 g g –1 , respectively, whereas, those for HSB-W8 and Co-IPT-IBA are 2.32 g g –1 , and 2.88 g g –1 , respectively. Compared to this, ionic iodine transfer studies in the aqueous phase are rare.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The latter technique, which employs porous materials, is considered the most promising due to its high adsorption capacity, versatile use, and economic feasibility [13][14][15][16][17]. As a result, myriad porous materials have been synthesized and tested for iodine capture, including, among others, activated carbon [18], metalorganic framework structures (MOF) [19,20], organic polymers [21,22], covalent organic frameworks (COFs) [23,24] and amorphous materials [25,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These uptake values are comparable or better (in some cases) than those exhibited by other porous materials reported in the literature (Table S3). , Further, the thermogravimetric profiles reveal an apparent weight loss of 45.5% for I 2 @1a (Figure d) and 44% for I 2 @2a (Figure e) in the range 30–225 °C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%