“…Previous studies suggested that MHT could be identified as an anisotropic zone (e.g., Schulte‐Pelkum et al., 2005), or a weakening interface due to trapped water released from underthrusting sediments (e.g., Nábělek et al., 2009). It is noteworthy that multiple across‐strike receiver functions and reflection seismic studies in different parts of the Himalayas observed a sharp impedance boundary with high amplitude for MHT, implying that the nature of MHT could be reflected as a velocity contrast separating the Indian crust and the Himalayan orogenic wedge (e.g., Bai et al., 2019; Caldwell et al., 2013; Gao et al., 2016; He et al., 2018; Subedi et al., 2018; Xu et al., 2021), although this contrast could be weak. If this is the case, the geometry of MHT could be possibly delineated with seismic velocities.…”