2021
DOI: 10.1029/2020jb021219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eastward Dipping Style of the Underthrusting Indian Lithosphere Beneath the Tethyan Himalaya Illuminated by P and S Receiver Functions

Abstract: The Himalaya, extending for almost 2,500 km along strike, resulted from the India-Asia collision and convergence beginning at ∼65 Ma (DeCelles et al., 2014; Ding et al., 2005). Global positioning system (GPS) measurements estimate a shortening rate of ∼15 mm/year along the Himalaya (Zheng et al., 2017), leading to the development of an upper crustal fold-thrust belt. Three major north-dipping thrust faults, namely, the Main Frontal Thrust (MFT), Main Boundary Thrust (MBT) and Main Central Thrust (MCT), merge w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
(94 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies suggested that MHT could be identified as an anisotropic zone (e.g., Schulte‐Pelkum et al., 2005), or a weakening interface due to trapped water released from underthrusting sediments (e.g., Nábělek et al., 2009). It is noteworthy that multiple across‐strike receiver functions and reflection seismic studies in different parts of the Himalayas observed a sharp impedance boundary with high amplitude for MHT, implying that the nature of MHT could be reflected as a velocity contrast separating the Indian crust and the Himalayan orogenic wedge (e.g., Bai et al., 2019; Caldwell et al., 2013; Gao et al., 2016; He et al., 2018; Subedi et al., 2018; Xu et al., 2021), although this contrast could be weak. If this is the case, the geometry of MHT could be possibly delineated with seismic velocities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies suggested that MHT could be identified as an anisotropic zone (e.g., Schulte‐Pelkum et al., 2005), or a weakening interface due to trapped water released from underthrusting sediments (e.g., Nábělek et al., 2009). It is noteworthy that multiple across‐strike receiver functions and reflection seismic studies in different parts of the Himalayas observed a sharp impedance boundary with high amplitude for MHT, implying that the nature of MHT could be reflected as a velocity contrast separating the Indian crust and the Himalayan orogenic wedge (e.g., Bai et al., 2019; Caldwell et al., 2013; Gao et al., 2016; He et al., 2018; Subedi et al., 2018; Xu et al., 2021), although this contrast could be weak. If this is the case, the geometry of MHT could be possibly delineated with seismic velocities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%