2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2019.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eastern Boundary Upwelling Systems response to different atmospheric forcing in a global eddy-permitting ocean model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our climatological run was forced with monthly mean winds derived from ERA-Interim (Dee et al, 2011), which, at the time of testing, provided an overall better performance of the model compared to other QuickSCAT products (Risien and Chelton, 2008). Despite the well known biases of Era-Interim product at coast (Bonino et al, 2019b;Taboada et al, 2019), our upwelling estimations are in agreement with Messié et al (2009) estimations, which compute vertical transports from…”
Section: Model Limitationssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Our climatological run was forced with monthly mean winds derived from ERA-Interim (Dee et al, 2011), which, at the time of testing, provided an overall better performance of the model compared to other QuickSCAT products (Risien and Chelton, 2008). Despite the well known biases of Era-Interim product at coast (Bonino et al, 2019b;Taboada et al, 2019), our upwelling estimations are in agreement with Messié et al (2009) estimations, which compute vertical transports from…”
Section: Model Limitationssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The authors further claimed that this atmospheric resolution is required for a better representation of the simulated wind stress curl near the African coast. In line with this, the model study of [149] highlighted that near-shore wind affects the representation of near-surface eastern boundary currents and this has a concomitant impact on the SST. Regarding the vertical resolution of the models, in ref.…”
Section: Modeling the Climate Of The Tamentioning
confidence: 56%
“…This technique allows for the correction of coastal wind patterns off EBUS, due to the accuracy of QuikSCAT 53,54 . In JRA55, although significantly improving on ERAInterim 55 , the representation of wind drop off is still an open issue that can effect Ekman pumping, coastal upwelling 9 and alongshore transport 56 . In addition, the resolution of the Japanese reanalysis (~55 km) is still too coarse to resolve upwelling dynamics, which are typically confined to within 30 km from the coast.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%