2016
DOI: 10.1097/olq.0000000000000406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ease, Comfort, and Performance of the HerSwab Vaginal Self-Sampling Device for the Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae

Abstract: HerSwab SCV samples are suitable for the diagnosis of CT and NG.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
43
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…But even for the investigation of malignant and pre-malignant lesions, new screening tools based on self-sampling coupled with molecular tests for HPV DNA amplification and/or rapid tests for detection of highrisk HPV oncoproteins have been studied, exhibiting promising results [18]. The reasons most often reported by women who preferred self-collection were "privacy" and "comfort", which is in agreement with other studies, since the main barriers conveyed to IST screening include shame (especially with male professionals), fear of pain, discomfort with pelvic examination, invasiveness of professional collection, distrust of confidentiality, and long waiting times in clinics [19][20][21]. On the other hand, some women indicated concern about the safety of the method (that is, it may be that they are not doing the collection correctly, which could generate a false negative result) considering the collection by a professional to be safer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…But even for the investigation of malignant and pre-malignant lesions, new screening tools based on self-sampling coupled with molecular tests for HPV DNA amplification and/or rapid tests for detection of highrisk HPV oncoproteins have been studied, exhibiting promising results [18]. The reasons most often reported by women who preferred self-collection were "privacy" and "comfort", which is in agreement with other studies, since the main barriers conveyed to IST screening include shame (especially with male professionals), fear of pain, discomfort with pelvic examination, invasiveness of professional collection, distrust of confidentiality, and long waiting times in clinics [19][20][21]. On the other hand, some women indicated concern about the safety of the method (that is, it may be that they are not doing the collection correctly, which could generate a false negative result) considering the collection by a professional to be safer.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…14 Self-collection of rectal and vaginal samples is accurate, may be preferable to provider collection, and may be one way to further increase screening. 2729 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Es conocido que el diagnóstico de laboratorio es limitado en poblaciones urbano-rurales de países de bajos y medianos recursos. Una estrategia para masificar el tamizaje de estas infecciones, es el uso de la autotoma (AC) de muestras para el diagnóstico de laboratorio que se han utilizado en centros de atención (6) , clínicas (7) , en casa (8) o en carpas de campaña (9) . La técnica de autotoma para la identificación de ITS es aceptable y preferida en comparación a la colección estándar realizada por un personal de salud, principalmente en poblaciones urbanas pero también en poblaciones rurales (10,11) .…”
Section: Mensajes Claveunclassified