2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-14636-7_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earthworm Interactions with Soil Enzymes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is generally accepted that soil enzymes come mainly from microbes (Burns et al, 2013), so it is reasonable to expect that microbial proliferation during bioremediation should trigger an increase of soil enzyme activities. Indeed, some studies have demonstrated that proliferation of soil microbes associated with soil-dwelling earthworm species (Lumbricus terrestris and Metaphire guillelmi), increases enzyme activities related to C, N and P cycling (Tao et al, 2009;Kizilkaya et al, 2010;Dempsey et al, 2013). Despite this direct relationship, no studies have examined such functional association during bioremediation of pesticide-contaminated soils.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally accepted that soil enzymes come mainly from microbes (Burns et al, 2013), so it is reasonable to expect that microbial proliferation during bioremediation should trigger an increase of soil enzyme activities. Indeed, some studies have demonstrated that proliferation of soil microbes associated with soil-dwelling earthworm species (Lumbricus terrestris and Metaphire guillelmi), increases enzyme activities related to C, N and P cycling (Tao et al, 2009;Kizilkaya et al, 2010;Dempsey et al, 2013). Despite this direct relationship, no studies have examined such functional association during bioremediation of pesticide-contaminated soils.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluctuations on ground-dwelling invertebrates, such as small arthropods and earthworms, may decrease or increase food availability to adults and subadults (e.g. Vannier 1983, Kizilkaya et al 2011). However, given body size constraint, fluctuations in the abundance of micro-arthropods may increase or decrease food supply to juveniles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In different pedoecosystems they enhanced mineralisation and nutrient availability in soil (12,6,13). They contribute to soil aeration, drainage and transformation of plant vitals (minerals and nutrients) to accessible forms, thus making the soil favorable for enhanced crop yield (14,15,16 Gupta et al (24) vermicomposed water hyacinth using E. fetida, reported its effective conversion when water hyacinth was mixed with 25% of cow dung (dry weight). Kostecka and Kaniuczak (25) vermicomposted Lemna minor (Duck weed) in small containers using E. fetida and recorded increase in earthworm number and biomass in containers with duckweed and manure dung than in containers with pure duckweed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Sannigrahi (26) noxious aquatic weeds-water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes), water hyacinth (E. crassipes) and cattail (Typha angustata) could be managed beneficially by converting them into good quality vermicompost within 2 to 3 months using P. excavates. Chauhan and Joshi (27) vermicomposted noxious weedwater hyacinth (E. crassipes) by using E. fetida and results showed an increase in NPK and decrease in carbon and carbon:nitrogen ratio in the (14) studied the potential of E. fetida to manage/recycle the different macrophytes in different combinations during two months experimentation and concluded that nature of weed affect E. fetida in terms of growth and reproduction, which in turn determines its recycling rate as ascertained by principal component analysis (PCA). Umavathi et al (33) studied the vermicompost from the aquatic weed E. crassipes by employing the earthworm E. eugeniae and concluded that nutrients content of E. crassipes digested vermicompost were enhanced by the earthworm's digestive enzymes and gut microbes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%