Memoir 108: Petroleum Geology and Potential of the Colombian Caribbean Margin
DOI: 10.1306/13531939m1083642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earthquake, Tomographic, Seismic Reflection, and Gravity Evidence for a Shallowly Dipping Subduction Zone beneath the Caribbean Margin of Northwestern Colombia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
2
1

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
41
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While there are uncertainties about the precise age of this accretion, both earlier estimates based on biostratigraphy placing the accretion age at~13-12 Ma [Duque-Caro, 1990a, 1990b and more recent work based on detrital zircons that estimate the closure of the Central American Seaway at between 15 and 13 Ma [Montes et al, 2015] are broadly consistent with these results. This indicates that the plate subducting north of this offset today is the same plate that is subducting south of this offset, in contradiction to earlier studies suggesting that the offset represents the boundary between two separate plates [e.g., van der Hilst and Mann, 1994;Taboada et al, 2000;Corredor, 2003;Cortés and Angelier, 2005;Vargas and Mann, 2013;Sanchez-Rojas and Palma, 2014;Bernal-Olaya et al, 2015a;Idárraga-García et al, 2016]. This is consistent with the Panama-Choco block being very near in its modern position by 12 Ma and that the subduction responsible for this arc is the subduction of the Nazca Plate and not the subduction between the Panama-Choco block and NW South America.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…While there are uncertainties about the precise age of this accretion, both earlier estimates based on biostratigraphy placing the accretion age at~13-12 Ma [Duque-Caro, 1990a, 1990b and more recent work based on detrital zircons that estimate the closure of the Central American Seaway at between 15 and 13 Ma [Montes et al, 2015] are broadly consistent with these results. This indicates that the plate subducting north of this offset today is the same plate that is subducting south of this offset, in contradiction to earlier studies suggesting that the offset represents the boundary between two separate plates [e.g., van der Hilst and Mann, 1994;Taboada et al, 2000;Corredor, 2003;Cortés and Angelier, 2005;Vargas and Mann, 2013;Sanchez-Rojas and Palma, 2014;Bernal-Olaya et al, 2015a;Idárraga-García et al, 2016]. This is consistent with the Panama-Choco block being very near in its modern position by 12 Ma and that the subduction responsible for this arc is the subduction of the Nazca Plate and not the subduction between the Panama-Choco block and NW South America.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 86%
“…There is considerable debate on the geometries of the downgoing Nazca and Caribbean Plates [e.g., van der Hilst and Mann, 1994;Taboada et al, 2000;Corredor, 2003;Cortés and Angelier, 2005;Zarifi et al, 2007;Vargas and Mann, 2013;Bernal-Olaya et al, 2015a, 2015b, 2015cSyracuse et al, 2016;Chiarabba et al, 2016]. There is considerable debate on the geometries of the downgoing Nazca and Caribbean Plates [e.g., van der Hilst and Mann, 1994;Taboada et al, 2000;Corredor, 2003;Cortés and Angelier, 2005;Zarifi et al, 2007;Vargas and Mann, 2013;Bernal-Olaya et al, 2015a, 2015b, 2015cSyracuse et al, 2016;Chiarabba et al, 2016].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, convergence in the study area does not involve the Nazca Plate, but instead, it involves the Caribbean Plate, which is separated from the Cocos and Nazca Plates by the Panama‐Chocó block (inset in Figure ). It has been proposed that this area is characterized by the slow and flat slab subduction of the Caribbean oceanic plate beneath South America, forming the Bucaramanga and Caribbean flat slabs imaged and described by several researchers (Bernal‐Olaya, Mann, & Vargas, ; Chiarabba et al, ; Pennington, ; Syracuse et al, ; Taboada et al, ; Van der Hilst & Mann, ). Slow and flat slab subduction would be the cause of the low seismicity and of the lack of a magmatic arc in northwestern Colombia (inset in Figure ).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%