2019
DOI: 10.1080/13632469.2019.1695691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earthquake Response Analysis of Soils from Rudrapur and Khatima Sites Adjacent to Himalayan Frontal Thrust (HFT) using Field and Laboratory-Derived Dynamic Soil Properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variation in PGA values was 0.32-0.78 g for the ML-type soil. Naik et al [9] conducted one-and two-dimensional dynamic site response analyses of soil for the sites of Rudrapur and Khatima located in the state of Uttarakhand. The variation in PGA value was 0.05 to 0.60 g for SP-, ML-and CI-type soil.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Obtained Pga From This Study With The Reported Pgamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The variation in PGA values was 0.32-0.78 g for the ML-type soil. Naik et al [9] conducted one-and two-dimensional dynamic site response analyses of soil for the sites of Rudrapur and Khatima located in the state of Uttarakhand. The variation in PGA value was 0.05 to 0.60 g for SP-, ML-and CI-type soil.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Obtained Pga From This Study With The Reported Pgamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soil layer of depth 9 m-15 m is prone to liquefaction. Naik et al [9] carried out 1D and 2D ground response analyses for the estimation of liquefaction potential of soils from Rudrapur and Khatima sites located in the state of Uttarakhand. The soil layer of depth 7 m-13 m is prone to liquefaction.…”
Section: Comparison Of Liquefaction Potential Of Soils With the Reported Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are several methodologies for the estimation of liquefaction potential of the soil using in situ field testing parameters like SPT-N, Cone Penetration Test (CPT), shear wave velocity at 30 m (Vs 30 ) as we all several laboratory testing methods such as cyclic triaxial test, resonant column test, shake table test, etc. [65][66][67]. The lab testing methods are complex and lead to difficulties associated with sample disturbance during sampling and testing.…”
Section: Spt Based Liquefaction Potential Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several methodologies for the estimation of liquefaction potential of the soil using in situ field testing parameters like SPT-N, Cone Penetration Test (CPT), shear www.videleaf.com wave velocity at 30 m (Vs 30 ) as we all several laboratory testing methods such as cyclic triaxial test, resonant column test, shake table test, etc. [65][66][67]. The lab testing methods are complex and lead to difficulties associated with sample disturbance during sampling and testing.…”
Section: Spt Based Liquefaction Potential Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%