2020
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggaa252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earthquake productivity law

Abstract: SUMMARY Mechanisms of stress transfer and probabilistic models have been widely investigated to explain earthquake clustering features. However, these approaches are still far from being able to link individual events and to determine the number of earthquakes caused by a single event. An alternative approach based on proximity functions allows us to generate hierarchical clustering trees and to identify pairs of nearest-neighbours between consecutive levels of hierarchy. Then, the productivity … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This work continues our research into spatiotemporal patterns of seismicity in mining regions. Conducting our investigation into the subject, we validated the productivity law established in our previous works (Baranov and Shebalin, 2020;Shebalin et al, 2020) for the conditions of mining-induced seismicity by showing that the number of the triggered events shocks initiated by an earlier event (productivity) obeys exponential distribution (Baranov et al, 2020). Here, the single parameter of the exponential distribution is independent of the magnitude of the triggering event.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…This work continues our research into spatiotemporal patterns of seismicity in mining regions. Conducting our investigation into the subject, we validated the productivity law established in our previous works (Baranov and Shebalin, 2020;Shebalin et al, 2020) for the conditions of mining-induced seismicity by showing that the number of the triggered events shocks initiated by an earlier event (productivity) obeys exponential distribution (Baranov et al, 2020). Here, the single parameter of the exponential distribution is independent of the magnitude of the triggering event.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Another disadvantage of the stochastic declustering methods is their basic hypothesis that the number of aftershocks is a function of the magnitude of the corresponding main shock. This hypothesis, as was recently found, is not true (Shebalin et al, 2020).…”
Section: Selection Of Aftershock Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…All aftershocks (as described above, we consider only direct aftershocks of the large earthquakes considered using the nearest neighbor approach), both onshore and offshore ones, were used to estimate the parameters of the Omori-Utsu law (Utsu, 1961), but only the offshore aftershocks were used to calculate the effects of ocean tides on seismicity. For selection of direct aftershocks in Kamchatka and New Zealand we used the parameters listed in Supplementaty Table S1 of (Shebalin et al, 2020).…”
Section: Selection Of Aftershock Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, large uncertainties associated with these model parameters can result in significant underestimation/overestimation of the probabilities for the largest expected events or the numbers of earthquakes above a certain magnitude during the forecasting time intervals. This is particularly evident for the Omori‐Utsu law, where the productivity of the process is controlled by the K o parameter, which is typically estimated with large uncertainties (Marsan & Helmstetter, 2017; Shebalin et al., 2020). On the other hand, the Bayesian framework fully incorporates these model uncertainties into the computation of the probabilities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%