1973
DOI: 10.1126/science.181.4102.803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earthquake Prediction: A Physical Basis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

15
388
1
16

Year Published

1976
1976
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,023 publications
(422 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
15
388
1
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Knowledge of the amount, size, and geometry of these cracks and how they effect the mechanical behavior of rock (peak strength, stiffness, and permeability) is extremely important in engineering endeavors and in the understanding of geological processes. In particular, the way in which fractures form and coalesce may have importance in earthquake understanding and prediction [Locknet, 1995;Scholz et al, 1973]. It has long been known that the strength of brittle rocks under compression depends on the growth of flaws and cracks and how these cracks propagate and coalesce into larger shear faults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge of the amount, size, and geometry of these cracks and how they effect the mechanical behavior of rock (peak strength, stiffness, and permeability) is extremely important in engineering endeavors and in the understanding of geological processes. In particular, the way in which fractures form and coalesce may have importance in earthquake understanding and prediction [Locknet, 1995;Scholz et al, 1973]. It has long been known that the strength of brittle rocks under compression depends on the growth of flaws and cracks and how these cracks propagate and coalesce into larger shear faults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When it is viewed in this light, Scholz et al [1973] describe the phenomenon of positive dilatancy in rocks as a physical basis for such possible earthquake precursors as change in seismic velocity ratio, electrical resistivity, radon emission, and geodetic measurements, Beaumont and Berger [1974] computed the effect of dilatancy on the tidal response of the crust, and Whitcomb [1975] examined 3495 ltu AND LIVANOS: BULGING IN UNIAXIAl.LY COMPRESSED GRANITE quantitatively the dependence of vertical geodetic (including leveling, tilt, and geometric measurement relative to a celestial frame of reference), and gravity measurements in relation to dilatancy density change. A volume of crust undergoing positive dilatancy is assumed in these calculations, and the consequences are then computed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5M+2.6 (TSUBOI, 1967), is penetrated by one of the travel-paths of our experiment to a certain extent, and (b) whether or not 1.15 (SCHOLZ et al, 1973), includes at leas tone event (shot time) of our experiment. Since no such adequate earthquake was found, we have not yet had an opportunity to verify whether the precursory P-wave delay had been generated or not in our research region.…”
Section: Relation To Earthquakes Of Moderate Magnitudementioning
confidence: 99%