2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11589-013-0005-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earthquake magnitude estimation using the τc and Pd method for earthquake early warning systems

Abstract: Earthquake early warning (EEW) systems are one of the most effective ways to reduce earthquake disaster. Earthquake magnitude estimation is one of the most important and also the most difficult parts of the entire EEW system. In this paper, based on 142 earthquake events and 253 seismic records that were recorded by the KiK-net in Japan, and aftershocks of the large Wenchuan earthquake in Sichuan, we obtained earthquake magnitude estimation relationships using the s c and P d methods. The standard variances of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even for the same magnitude scale, values reported by different agencies may differ by up to 0.5 units (Mousavi & Beroza, 2020). Traditionally, frequency‐domain parameters such as predominant period τpmax0.25em ${\tau }_{p}^{\mathrm{max}\,}$ (Allen & Kanamori, 2003; Nakamura, 1988), effective average period τ c (Jin et al., 2013; Kanamori, 2005; Kuyuk & Allen, 2013) and amplitude domain parameters such as peak displacement ( P d ) (Jin et al., 2013; Kuyuk & Allen, 2013; Wu & Zhao, 2006) calculated from the initial 1–3 s of P waves have been shown to provide reliable estimates of (body wave) magnitudes through empirical relations. Such methods have been applied to Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) systems in Japan, California, Taiwan, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even for the same magnitude scale, values reported by different agencies may differ by up to 0.5 units (Mousavi & Beroza, 2020). Traditionally, frequency‐domain parameters such as predominant period τpmax0.25em ${\tau }_{p}^{\mathrm{max}\,}$ (Allen & Kanamori, 2003; Nakamura, 1988), effective average period τ c (Jin et al., 2013; Kanamori, 2005; Kuyuk & Allen, 2013) and amplitude domain parameters such as peak displacement ( P d ) (Jin et al., 2013; Kuyuk & Allen, 2013; Wu & Zhao, 2006) calculated from the initial 1–3 s of P waves have been shown to provide reliable estimates of (body wave) magnitudes through empirical relations. Such methods have been applied to Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) systems in Japan, California, Taiwan, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, effective average period τ c (Jin et al, 2013;Kanamori, 2005;Kuyuk & Allen, 2013) and amplitude domain parameters such as peak displacement (P d ) (Jin et al, 2013;Kuyuk & Allen, 2013;Wu & Zhao, 2006) calculated from the initial 1-3 s of P waves have been shown to provide reliable estimates of (body wave) magnitudes through empirical relations. Such methods have been applied to Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) systems in Japan, California, Taiwan, etc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to its original definition [1] the magnitude of an earthquake is the logarithm of the maximum trace amplitude expressed in microns measured by a standard short-period torsion seismometer at an epicentral distance of 100km. It is one of "the most important and also the most difficult parameters" involved in real-time seismology [2] particularly since most magnitude scales such as local magnitude (m L ), body wave magnitude (m B ), surface wave magnitude (m S ) are empirical and saturate at different magnitude ranges [3,4]. This, coupled with the complexity of the nature of the geophysical processes affecting earthquakes, makes it very difficult to have a single reliable measure for the size of an earthquake [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even for the same magnitude scale, values reported by different agencies may differ by up to 0.5 units [10]. Traditionally, frequency-domain parameters such as predominant period τ max p [11,12], effective average period τ c [2,13,14] and amplitude domain parameters such as peak displacement (P d ) [2,14,15] calculated from the initial 1-3 seconds of P-waves have been shown to provide reliable estimates of (body wave) magnitudes through empirical relations. Such methods have been applied to Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) systems in Japan, California, Taiwan etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to above-mentioned reasons and the empirical nature of majority of the magnitude scales, it is one of the most difficult parameters to estimate [5,6]. Some of the classical approaches to obtain first estimates of earthquake magnitude have used empirical relations for parameters such as predominant period τ max p [7,8], effective average period τ c [9,10] in the frequency domain and parameters such as peak displacement (P d ) [10,11] in the amplitude domain calculated from the initial 1-3 seconds of P-waves. These relations form the basis of existing Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) systems in Japan, California, Taiwan etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%