2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earthquake induced liquefaction features in the Karewas of Kashmir Valley North-West Himalayas, India: Implication to paleoseismicity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The liquefaction potential index (LPI) considers both the geometrical parameter of the liquefiable layer and the associated (Iwasaki 1978 ; Iwasaki et al 1982 ). The map for the Kashmir valley was proposed based on SPT-based method, which suggests that maximum boreholes in Baramulla and Kupwara demonstrate very high LPI (Dar and Dubey 2015 ; Khan and Shah 2016 ; Sana and Nath 2016 ; Zahoor et al 2019 ). The site condition for different values of and, the required plan of action for liquefaction mitigation is mentioned in Table 3 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The liquefaction potential index (LPI) considers both the geometrical parameter of the liquefiable layer and the associated (Iwasaki 1978 ; Iwasaki et al 1982 ). The map for the Kashmir valley was proposed based on SPT-based method, which suggests that maximum boreholes in Baramulla and Kupwara demonstrate very high LPI (Dar and Dubey 2015 ; Khan and Shah 2016 ; Sana and Nath 2016 ; Zahoor et al 2019 ). The site condition for different values of and, the required plan of action for liquefaction mitigation is mentioned in Table 3 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guiraud et al (1993) discussed the relationship between seismites and magnitude of cretaceous paleoearthquake, at the same time connected forming process of soft sediment lique ed curled deformation with earthquake facies triggered by activities of growth faults, taking the relationship among focal depth, magnitude and sediments liquefaction into consideration, and excluded deformation caused by ancient slope, gravity load and diagenesis. In geological history, softsediment curled deformation structures with some small growth faults have a wide distribution, which are associated with the earthquake vibration, and they are considered as a crucial key to determine whether the paleoearthquake exists or not (Obermeier, 1996;Pope et al, 1997;Ettensohn et al, 2000;Moretti, 2000;Zhang et al, 2007;Houston et al, 2008;Khan and Shah, 2016;Ezquerro et al, 2016;Deev et al, 2018Deev et al, , 2019; Qiao et al, (1994) called layers with curled deformation and boudinage structures as earthquake fold rocks, which were formed when these original sediments were transformed in situ.…”
Section: Soft-sediment Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guiraud et al discussed the relationship between seismites and magnitude of cretaceous paleoearthquake, at the same time connected forming process of soft sediment liquefied curled deformation with earthquake facies triggered by activities of growth faults, taking the relationship among focal depth, magnitude and sediments liquefaction into consideration, and excluded deformation caused by ancient slope, gravity load and diagenesis [42]. In geological history, soft-sediment curled deformation structures with some small growth faults have a wide distribution, which are associated with the earthquake vibration, and they are considered as a crucial key to determine whether the paleoearthquake exists or not called layers with curled deformation and boudinage structures as earthquake fold rocks, which were formed when these original sediments were transformed in situ [28,[43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52].…”
Section: Soft-sediment Deformationmentioning
confidence: 99%