2001
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earthquake‐induced floor horizontal accelerations in buildings

Abstract: SUMMARYFloor horizontal accelerations are needed for obtaining forces for the design of diaphragms, for the design of their connections and for the design of non-structural components and equipment supported by structures. Large oor horizontal accelerations have been recorded in buildings during earthquakes. Such accelerations have been responsible for inertia forces causing damage to services and are a major reason for structural damage and even building collapse.This paper describes an analytical investigati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
94
1
9

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
6
94
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6 shows clearly that there are very large differences between the shapes of the bending moment envelopes obtained from the MRSA and the NDTHA, and the differences become more pronounced in the 20-and 40-story buildings. As pointed out by others [5,8,9,13,14], the second and other higher modes are not greatly affected by the base plasticity as inferred by the MRSA and this is the main reason for the differences in shapes. This figure also shows that the bending moment envelopes obtained from the NDTHA reaches or exceeds the EC8 linear design envelopes in all cases.…”
Section: I / (W T H) M I / (W T H) M I / (W T H)mentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 6 shows clearly that there are very large differences between the shapes of the bending moment envelopes obtained from the MRSA and the NDTHA, and the differences become more pronounced in the 20-and 40-story buildings. As pointed out by others [5,8,9,13,14], the second and other higher modes are not greatly affected by the base plasticity as inferred by the MRSA and this is the main reason for the differences in shapes. This figure also shows that the bending moment envelopes obtained from the NDTHA reaches or exceeds the EC8 linear design envelopes in all cases.…”
Section: I / (W T H) M I / (W T H) M I / (W T H)mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Elastic forces obtained from the modal combinations are reduced by a force reduction factor to obtain design forces. In 2002, Rodriguez et al [13] suggested that inelastic response at the base of cantilever walls reduces mainly the first mode of response. Consequently, the relative contribution of the higher modes to response quantities, such as bending moments and shear forces, increases with an increase in ground motion intensity augmenting the curvature ductility demand at the base.…”
Section: Significant Near Mid-height At About Two-thirds Of the Heigmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diaphragm design methodology [1], including design factors determined here and rational methods proposed by the research team [2,19], serves as the basis for comprehensive modifications to diaphragm design currently in the codification process [4,5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following trends are further identified in Figure 12: (i) maximum diaphragm force typically increases with number of stories, because of the importance of higher mode effects in these structures [19]; (ii) diaphragm force increases with aspect ratio (because the corresponding increase in diaphragm flexibility tends to amplify diaphragm motion relative to the LFRS) to a point where diaphragm flexibility becomes sufficiently high to partially isolate the diaphragm response from the LFRS, and thus tends toward lower diaphragm force amplification, as also seen in simpler models [18]; (iii) the effect of number of stories is more significant than that of diaphragm aspect ratio, implying that higher mode effects are more significant than the effect of diaphragm flexibility, particularly for elastic diaphragm response; (iv) moment frame structures show similar but slightly smaller diaphragm force amplification than shear wall structures; and, (v) the smaller diaphragm depth (d = 9.7 m) associated with hollow-core exhibits slightly smaller diaphragm force amplifications than comparable deeper diaphragm cases (d = 18.2 m) associated with double tees.…”
Section: Diaphragm Force Amplification Factorsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Such a mechanism may result in large residual drifts and structural collapse [1,2]. Steel CBFs is likely to experience high absolute floor acceleration demands even at low seismic intensities due to their high lateral stiffness [3,4]. Moreover, prior studies [5,6] indicated that steel brace flexural buckling is typically triggered at relatively small story drifts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%