Earthquake contributions to coastal cliff retreat

Abstract

Abstract. Modeling suggests that steep coastal regions will experience increasingly rapid erosion related to climate-change-induced sea level rise. Earthquakes can also cause intense episodes of coastal cliff retreat, but coseismic failures are rarely captured in the historical record used to calibrate most cliff retreat forecast models. Here, we disaggregate cliff-top retreat related to strong ground motion and non-seismic sources, providing a unique window into earthquake contributions to multidecadal coastal cliff retreat. Widespread landsliding and up to ca. 19 m of coastal cliff-top retreat occurred in the area of Conway Flat during the 2016 Kaikōura (New Zealand) earthquake despite relatively low (ca. 0.2 g) peak ground accelerations. While coastal cliff-top retreat has been spatially and temporally variable over the historical record, aerial imagery suggests that large earthquake-induced landslide-triggering events disproportionately contribute to an average 0.25 m yr−1 retreat at Conway Flat. The 2016 Kaikōura earthquake represents ca. 24 % of the total cliff-top retreat over 72 years and ca. 39 % of cliff-top retreat over 56 years. Additionally, we infer that significant retreat between 1950 and 1966 is the result of local seismicity. Together these two events account for ca. 57 % of cliff-top retreat over 72 years. Earthquake-related debris piles at the base of the cliffs have been rapidly eroded since the 2016 Kaikōura earthquake (more than 25 % loss of debris volume in 5 years), and there will likely be little evidence of the earthquake within the next decade. In regions with similar lithologic and coastal conditions, evidence of past widespread single-event cliff-top retreat may be limited or non-existent. The results demonstrate that cliff-top retreat projections using historical records may significantly underestimate true retreat rates in seismically active regions.

Uplifted Pleistocene Marine Terraces at Active Margins: Modeling Reveals the Effects of Sea Reoccupation and Coseismic Uplift on Uplift Rate Calculation

“…Although we analyze β z and β x separately, downwear and backwear operate simultaneously in nature: their individual contribution to terrace erosion and shaping strongly depends on lithology, climate, and surface elevation relative to the local tidal range (Dickson et al., 2022; Payo et al., 2015), and can be amplified by phenomena such as intense storm surges or earthquake‐induced landsliding (e.g., Bloom et al., 2023; Brooks et al., 2012). Furthermore, in nature the erosional parameters ( β z , β x , h wb ) can vary depending on site‐specific response to local factors.…”