2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-9455-1_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earthquake Casualty Models Within the USGS Prompt Assessment of Global Earthquakes for Response (PAGER) System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
95
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
95
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The empirical approach consists of directly correlating the magnitude/intensity of the earthquake and the size of the population in the area at times of the earthquake, based on historic earthquake statistics (Samadjieva and Badel 2002;Jaiswal and Wald 2010a). The semiempirical approach builds on the empirical approach by additionally accounting for the types of buildings that characterize the area and damage rates according to the different structures (Jaiswal and Wald 2010b). The purely analytic approach predicts behavior of buildings and their effects on individuals inside them, based on seismic hazard analysis (Porter et al 2008;Spence and So 2009).…”
Section: Earthquake Casualty Assessment Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The empirical approach consists of directly correlating the magnitude/intensity of the earthquake and the size of the population in the area at times of the earthquake, based on historic earthquake statistics (Samadjieva and Badel 2002;Jaiswal and Wald 2010a). The semiempirical approach builds on the empirical approach by additionally accounting for the types of buildings that characterize the area and damage rates according to the different structures (Jaiswal and Wald 2010b). The purely analytic approach predicts behavior of buildings and their effects on individuals inside them, based on seismic hazard analysis (Porter et al 2008;Spence and So 2009).…”
Section: Earthquake Casualty Assessment Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These functions relate the expected hazard intensities with the expected consequences and efforts have been made worldwide to develop relationships that allow estimating casualties, both in terms of injured and deaths, associated to earthquakes (Coburn and Spence 2002;FEMA 2003;Spence and So 2009;Jaiswal and Wald 2010;Jaiswal et al 2011) which are based mostly on post-earthquake surveys. It is well-known that this is a difficult task since high variability in the number of deaths can be observed from event to event, even when dealing with earthquakes of similar magnitudes, depths and building stock characteristics.…”
Section: Probabilistic Seismic Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different computer-based modeling approaches 1 that are well known and extensively used based on the requirements and zone of a particular study (IDNDR 1999;FEMA 2003;Elnashai and Hajjar 2006;Hancilar et al 2010;Jaiswal et al 2011;CAPRA 2012;GEM 2012). This study uses the Central American Probabilistic Risk Wu et al (2005) and Bhaduri et al (2007) Assessment (CAPRA) model, a recently developed methodology that was introduced for multihazard probabilistic and deterministic risk assessment.…”
Section: Population Distribution and Loss Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%