Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
Physics and Chemistry of the Deep Earth 2013
DOI: 10.1002/9781118529492.ch2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earth's Mantle Melting in the Presence of C–O–H–Bearing Fluid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
3
19
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The porous fl ow is controlled by infi ltration of nonporous silicate mantle. The estimated CO 2 outfl ux from slab to overlying mantle in the transition zone does not exceed 2 × 10 11 g/yr (calculated using data in Hammouda and Laporte, 2000; see also Litasov et al, 2013). The difference between the estimated fl uxes in and out is three orders of magnitude; thus, carbonatite melt formed during melting of subducted carbonate will accumulate at the slabmantle interface rather than percolate upward by porous fl ow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The porous fl ow is controlled by infi ltration of nonporous silicate mantle. The estimated CO 2 outfl ux from slab to overlying mantle in the transition zone does not exceed 2 × 10 11 g/yr (calculated using data in Hammouda and Laporte, 2000; see also Litasov et al, 2013). The difference between the estimated fl uxes in and out is three orders of magnitude; thus, carbonatite melt formed during melting of subducted carbonate will accumulate at the slabmantle interface rather than percolate upward by porous fl ow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Which scenario actually occurs depends on the fl ux of incoming carbonates subducted to the transition zone and the redox buffering capacity of interacting reservoirs. A reasonable estimation of CO 2 subduction infl ux is 1-5 × 10 14 g/yr if 2-3 wt% CO 2 is concentrated in the uppermost 500 m of the slab and the average subduction rate is 6 cm/yr (Litasov et al, 2013). The porous fl ow is controlled by infi ltration of nonporous silicate mantle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data are based on a study of both pyrolitic and chondritic solidi as 'dry' systems composed of only major elements (Si, Al, Fe, Ca and Mg), while the presence of alkalis and particularly C, O, H and other volatiles depress the solidus position drastically. The experimental data performed at 10-15 GPa pressure conditions demonstrated that the presence of C-O-H fluid and/or even the minor admixture of alkalis in peridotite produce carbonatitic melt at temperatures lower than adiabatic ones by as much as 400-500 °C (Litasov et al 2013a(Litasov et al , 2013b. It was demonstrated, in experiments at up to 80 GPa, that the melting behavior of simple carbonate systems is a suitable proxy for many carbonate-bearing lithologies (Thomson et al 2014).…”
Section: Formation Of Carbonatitic Partial Melts In the Lowermost Mantlementioning
confidence: 89%
“…Preliminary calculations of carbonatite melt mobility in the reduced mantle domains of the transition zone and lowermost upper mantle indicate that 0.5-1 km carbonatite diapir can move through overlying mantle domain (e.g., from depth of 550 to 200 km). First diapir will oxidize the overlying mantle section and only 30% of modal carbonate in the melt will be reduced (Litasov et al, 2013a(Litasov et al, , 2013b). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%