2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-018-1681-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earth observation data for assessing biodiversity conservation priorities in South Asia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This gap can be eliminated with advanced RS methods [49]. Additionally, considering ecosystem-level data should deliver a more detailed assessment of the strengths and gaps in current and proposed MPAs [50,51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This gap can be eliminated with advanced RS methods [49]. Additionally, considering ecosystem-level data should deliver a more detailed assessment of the strengths and gaps in current and proposed MPAs [50,51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reported that environmental proxies such as vegetation vigor, elevation, landscape diversity, and moisture influence alpine plant richness in the part of Western Himalaya studied. Reddy et al (2019) used forest persistence, ecosystem rarity, forest intactness, landscape level ecosystem, above ground biomass carbon stocks, and biological richness amongst biological criteria to analyze ecosystem irreplaceability. Overall representation of habitat coverage in protected area networks of seven south Asian countries revealed an under-representation of several forest types with < 17% coverage.…”
Section: Plant Diversity and Remote Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of HWCs in Nepal is a reflection of the conflicts occurring in South Asia, which is renowned for its rich biodiversity (Hasnat et al, 2018; Reddy et al, 2019). Nepal, located in the central Himalayas, is a mountainous country that covers less than 0.1% of the total global land area (Paudel et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%