2015
DOI: 10.1159/000434647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early versus Delayed Therapy of Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients - Does It Make a Difference?

Abstract: Background: Nearly 50% of gastric cancer patients are diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Therapy is palliative but results in ill effects. The median overall survival (OS) of AGC patients is often <12 months. It is unclear if the early initiation of therapy in all AGC patients is beneficial. Methods: A retrospective analysis of AGC patients in our database was carried out. The patients were divided into two groups: asymptomatic or symptomatic. We sought to assess whether the delay of systemic therap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A retrospective observational study utilizing the National Cancer Data Base found that delayed targeted therapy was not associated with worse OS in patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma [26] . A retrospective single center analysis from MD Anderson Cancer Center found that in patients with asymptomatic advanced gastric cancer, delayed systemic therapy did not result in detrimental OS [6] . These studies indicate that in carefully selected patients with advanced cancer, outcomes might not be compromised by surveillance and delayed systemic therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A retrospective observational study utilizing the National Cancer Data Base found that delayed targeted therapy was not associated with worse OS in patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma [26] . A retrospective single center analysis from MD Anderson Cancer Center found that in patients with asymptomatic advanced gastric cancer, delayed systemic therapy did not result in detrimental OS [6] . These studies indicate that in carefully selected patients with advanced cancer, outcomes might not be compromised by surveillance and delayed systemic therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these findings, a long WT for resectable solid cancer might be associated with a worse prognosis, but this association might depend on the volume of cancer patients in the particular hospital. However, there have been few reports on whether a delay in the initiation of chemotherapy for unresectable solid cancer will lead to adverse outcomes among patients[17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although propensity score matching analysis was used, it cannot enough remove selection bias for a single center and a small sample size study. However, Elimova et al[17] also reported that asymptomatic patients with delayed therapy (≥ 4 wk) had a good OS compared with patients with early therapy (< 4 wk), but the difference was not significant. They concluded that asymptomatic patients with delayed therapy had no detrimental effect on OS, suggesting that the timing of therapy can be based on patient selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are no validated clinicopathologic or biomarkers to help risk stratify patients with metastatic disease. Existing data, largely limited to population level registries, have identified several poor prognostic factors, including advanced age, male gender, poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), primary tumor location, and presence of peritoneal metastasis [ 3 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. Younger age, female gender, good performance status at diagnosis, and treatment with palliative chemotherapy have been associated with improved survival [ 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%