2015
DOI: 10.5558/tfc2015-045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Early vegetation control for the regeneration of a single-cohort, intimate mixture of white spruce and aspen on upland boreal sites – 10thyear update

Abstract: In Canada's boreal forest region, mixedwood stands dominated by trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) and white spruce (Picea glauca [Moench] Voss) are prominent and provide important timber and non-timber values. A paucity of silvicultural tools for regenerating mixedwood conditions prompted the establishment of an experiment in 2002, replicated in west-central Alberta and northeastern Ontario, to test a strategy for regenerating a single-cohort, intimate mixture of aspen and white spruce. After ten gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To compensate for this effect, analysis was completed using only the dominant subset of aspen in each plot (200 stems ha −1 top DBH aspen). Similar studies in this region have used 256 aspen ha −1 [30] or 100 aspen ha −1 [13][14][15] for analysis of aspen growth response to silvicultural treatments.…”
Section: Aspen Growth Response To Thinning Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compensate for this effect, analysis was completed using only the dominant subset of aspen in each plot (200 stems ha −1 top DBH aspen). Similar studies in this region have used 256 aspen ha −1 [30] or 100 aspen ha −1 [13][14][15] for analysis of aspen growth response to silvicultural treatments.…”
Section: Aspen Growth Response To Thinning Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment plot values were calculated for mortality (%), and weevil incidence (%). Height growth increment at age 10 was calculated by fitting a second-order polynomial to the time-series height values for each treatment plot and then evaluating the first derivative of the resulting function at age 10 [38].…”
Section: Planted Pine Response To Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yields from mixedwood stands may be higher than from single-species stands because of the physical, phenological, and successional differences in growth strategies that exist between aspen and white spruce (Man and Lieffers 1999;MacPherson et al 2001;Kabzems et al 2016;Kweon and Comeau 2019). Overstory aspen reduces damage of young spruce by growing season frost (Groot 1999;Pritchard and Comeau 2004;Filipescu and Comeau 2011) or winter injury (Pitt et al 2010(Pitt et al , 2015, and also reduces the vigor of understory competitors such as bluejoint reedgrass (Calamagrostis canadensis (Michx.) Beauv.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, preharvest treatments (using aerial application of herbicides, stem injection with herbicides, or girdling) can lead to reductions in post-harvest vigor of aspen and facilitate development of intimate mixtures (Bancroft 1989;Man et al 2011). Pitt et al (2010Pitt et al ( , 2015 proposed a strategy that involves planting spruce at 5-m spacing (400 stems per ha) together with naturally regenerating aspen and applying spot treatments to control competition immediately proximal to white spruce followed by precommercial thinning of the aspen. This approach could create intimate mixtures and promote the benefits of mixtures (nutrient cycling, mitigation of climatic extremes, biodiversity conservation), while reducing the area involved in vegetation management treatment and amount of herbicide used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation